Pathrule

List pending memory/rule refresh tasks

pathrule_list_pending_refreshes

Read-only

List pending Pathrule refresh tasks for a workspace. Refresh tasks are cloud suggestions that may update stale memories or rules. Use this first, then call pathrule_get_refresh_brief with a returned refresh_id before deciding whether to reject or resolve the task.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`workspace_id`	Yes	Workspace UUID from pathrule_list_workspaces.
`include_in_progress`	No	Include tasks already claimed by a client. Defaults to false for a clean todo list.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`ok`	Yes	true when the call succeeded. false when it did not, in which case `error` carries the reason and the success fields are absent.
`error`	No	Present only when ok is false.
`total`	No	Number of refresh tasks returned.
`refreshes`	No	Pending refresh tasks. Each carries a refresh_id for pathrule_get_refresh_brief.
`human_message`	No	One-line summary of the result, safe to relay to the user verbatim.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed1 schema field changedSep 5, 2026

changedOutput schema / (root)

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
+  "additionalProperties": true,
+  "properties": {
+    "error": {
+      "additionalProperties": true,
+      "description": "Present only when ok is false.",
+      "properties": {
+        "code": {
+          "description": "Stable machine-readable failure code, for example insufficient_scope, workspace_id_required, rate_limited, not_found, or upstream_error. Branch on this, not on message text.",
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "detail": {
+          "description": "Optional structured context for the failure, for example { missing_scopes: [...] } on insufficient_scope."
+        },
+        "message": {
+          "description": "Human-readable explanation of the failure.",
+          "type": "string"
+        }
+      },
+      "required": [
+        "code",
+        "message"
+      ],
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "human_message": {
+      "description": "One-line summary of the result, safe to relay to the user verbatim.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "ok": {
+      "description": "true when the call succeeded. false when it did not, in which case `error` carries the reason and the success fields are absent.",
+      "type": "boolean"
+    },
+    "refreshes": {
+      "description": "Pending refresh tasks. Each carries a refresh_id for pathrule_get_refresh_brief.",
+      "items": {},
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "total": {
+      "description": "Number of refresh tasks returned.",
+      "type": "number"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "ok"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

First observedMay 27, 2026

TDQS

A4.5/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the tool's safety profile is covered. The description adds useful behavioral context by framing refresh tasks as 'cloud suggestions' rather than direct updates, which helps the agent understand the tool doesn't apply changes itself. It does not discuss pagination or claim semantics, but the output schema and annotations reduce the need for that.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three concise sentences with no filler: the first states the operation, the second defines the domain concept, and the third gives the workflow. Each sentence earns its place and the key action is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given full schema parameter coverage, an output schema, and safety annotations, the description supplies the missing workflow context: list first, then fetch a brief, then decide. An agent has everything needed to invoke this tool correctly and chain it with the appropriate sibling.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with both workspace_id and include_in_progress already well documented, including defaults and provenance. The description adds no parameter-level detail beyond the schema, so the baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource: 'List pending Pathrule refresh tasks for a workspace.' It clearly distinguishes refresh tasks from actual memories/rules by explaining they are 'cloud suggestions that may update stale memories or rules,' and references pathrule_get_refresh_brief, separating this listing tool from sibling detail/action tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly provides workflow guidance: 'Use this first, then call pathrule_get_refresh_brief with a returned refresh_id before deciding whether to reject or resolve the task.' This tells the agent when to invoke the tool, what to do next, and why, which is strong usage guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Pathrule tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?