Skip to main content
Glama

Outil.io

Move slide

move_slide

Déplacer une diapositive du rang from au rang to.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "id": "<id>",
      "from": "<from>",
      "to": "<to>"
    },
    "name": "move_slide"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesIdentifiant de la présentation (renvoyé par create_presentation ou list_presentations).
toYesRang de la diapositive, à partir de 0 (0 = couverture).
fromYesRang de la diapositive, à partir de 0 (0 = couverture).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

B3.1/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false and openWorldHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. Beyond that the description discloses nothing about the effect of the move: whether intervening slides are shifted, what happens when from equals to, or whether the call is idempotent — meaningful gaps for an index-shifting mutation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single short sentence with no filler and the operation front-loaded. It is efficient, though brevity here borders on under-specification rather than tightness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a three-parameter mutation with no output schema and no informative annotations beyond safety hints, the description is too thin: it does not explain the resulting slide ordering or the effect on other slides' ranks.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the schema already defines id, from and to with 0-based rank semantics, so the description only restates the parameter names. It adds no meaning such as how the ranks of intervening slides shift.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (déplacer) and resource (diapositive) plus the source and destination ranks, so the reordering intent is unambiguous. It does not contrast itself with nearby siblings like update_slide or insert_slide, so an agent must infer the boundary itself.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The notion of moving between ranks implies the use case (reordering an existing slide) but there is no explicit when-to-use, no mention of update_slide as the alternative for content edits, and no preconditions stated. Usage is inferable but not guided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.