Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In

Outil.io

by io.outil
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

Complete task

complete_task

Livrer le résultat concret d’une tâche prise en charge. claimToken reçu de claim_task obligatoire ; failed=true si échec. Ne pas déclarer une action accomplie sans vérifier son résultat.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "id": "<id>",
      "claimToken": "<claimToken>"
    },
    "name": "complete_task"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYes
failedNo
resultNo
claimTokenYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Adds workflow context beyond the annotations: a validated claimToken is required, failure is signalled via a flag rather than an exception, and the agent is warned not to report success without verifying the result. The mutation's effect on the task record is still implicit rather than stated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three compact, front-loaded sentences with no filler; the prerequisite and failure semantics are stated before the cautionary note. Nothing is redundant.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and no parameter documentation, the description covers the workflow gate and failure path but leaves the shape and expectations for `result` and the meaning of `id` unexplained — important gaps for a terminal write operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the description must carry all parameter meaning, yet it only explains claimToken (64-char token from claim_task) and failed. The `id` and especially the free-form `result` payload — the tool's central input — are left undefined.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a concrete verb and object ('Livrer le résultat concret d'une tâche prise en charge') that unambiguously identifies a task-completion terminal action, and it is distinguishable from the sibling claim_task it references.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Establishes the prerequisite (claimToken obtained from claim_task) and the failure branch (failed=true). It does not contrast with adjacent state tools such as set_task_state or run_task, so the routing guidance is clear but not exhaustive.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Outil.io toolsInspect
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources