Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool has an output schema, rich annotations, and full schema-description coverage, so the description need not explain return values or every parameter. It covers the essential purpose, output format, and pagination behavior; however, it omits any mention of spaceKey fallback or context_id, relying entirely on the schema for those edge cases.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.