Opsphere — DevOps & SRE Intelligence

Azure Service Bus Namespace Health

azure_servicebus_namespace_health

Read-only

Gets health and status information of a namespace

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description
`namespace`	Yes	Service Bus namespace name
`context_id`	No	Optional explicit Connection Hub work context (ctx_*). Omit to use the conversation's active workspace; global Hub tools ignore it.
`resourceGroup`	No	Resource Group (optional)
`azure_tenant_id`	No	Azure tenant ID (optional — defaults to AZURE_TENANT_ID from tenant config)

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`ok`	Yes
`data`	Yes
`contractVersion`	Yes
`dataSchemaVersion`	Yes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed17 schema fields changedOct 26, 2026

changedOutput schema / properties / data / additionalProperties
```
Previous value: -trueNew value: +false
```
removedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / count
```
Removed value: -{
-  "type": "number"
-}
```

addedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / gaps

Added value: +{
+  "items": {
+    "type": "string"
+  },
+  "type": "array"
+}

removedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / items

Removed value: -{
-  "items": {
-    "additionalProperties": true,
-    "properties": {},
-    "type": "object"
-  },
-  "type": "array"
-}

addedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / metricAlerts

Added value: +{
+  "items": {
+    "additionalProperties": false,
+    "properties": {
+      "enabled": {
+        "type": "boolean"
+      },
+      "name": {
+        "type": "string"
+      }
+    },
+    "required": [
+      "name"
+    ],
+    "type": "object"
+  },
+  "type": "array"
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / namespace
```
Added value: +{
+  "type": "string"
+}
```
removedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / nextLink
```
Removed value: -{
-  "type": "string"
-}
```
addedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / partial
```
Added value: +{
+  "type": "boolean"
+}
```
addedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / provisioningState
```
Added value: +{
+  "type": "string"
+}
```
removedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / resourceGroup
```
Removed value: -{
-  "type": "string"
-}
```
removedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / subscriptionId
```
Removed value: -{
-  "type": "string"
-}
```
addedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / truncated
```
Added value: +{
+  "type": "boolean"
+}
```

removedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / value

Removed value: -{
-  "$ref": "#/properties/data/properties/items"
-}

addedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / warnings

Added value: +{
+  "items": {
+    "type": "string"
+  },
+  "type": "array"
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / data / required

Added value: +[
+  "namespace",
+  "partial",
+  "truncated",
+  "warnings",
+  "gaps"
+]

addedOutput schema / properties / dataSchemaVersion

Added value: +{
+  "const": 2,
+  "type": "number"
+}

changedOutput schema / required

Previous value: -[
-  "contractVersion",
-  "ok",
-  "data"
-]New value: +[
+  "contractVersion",
+  "dataSchemaVersion",
+  "ok",
+  "data"
+]

First observedOct 15, 2026

TDQS

C2.6/5.0

Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and openWorldHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds no behavioral context beyond that — not what "health" comprises, not whether it needs an authenticated Azure session or a resolved subscription, not how it differs from the overview tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single short clause with no filler and the resource front-loaded. It is efficiently written; the problem is under-specification, not verbosity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be explained, and the annotations cover safety. However, for a tool sitting in a dense cluster of overlapping Service Bus and health-overview tools, the description leaves the selection problem entirely unaddressed, which is the main thing an agent needs here.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and all four parameters (namespace, resourceGroup, context_id, azure_tenant_id) are documented in the schema itself. The description adds nothing about parameter semantics, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a verb ("Gets") and a resource ("health and status information of a namespace"), so the basic intent is legible. But "health and status information" is vague about what is actually returned, and it does nothing to distinguish this tool from close siblings like azure_servicebus_health_overview, azure_servicebus_monitoring_report, or azure_servicebus_namespaces.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use guidance, no prerequisites (e.g. an active Azure session), and no exclusion pointing at the sibling health/overview tools. An agent choosing among a dozen azure_servicebus_* tools gets no help from this sentence.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Opsphere — DevOps & SRE Intelligence tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?