Skip to main content
Glama

Leadbase | AI B2B Lead Generation

Sheets List Archived

sheets_list_archived
Read-onlyIdempotent

List owner-restorable archived sheet and folder roots with purge deadlines.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "sheets_list_archived"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
itemsYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare the operation read-only, idempotent, closed-world, and non-destructive, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds non-obvious behavioral scope: results are limited to "owner-restorable" items (not everything archived) and include purge deadlines, which tells the agent the listing will surface retention pressure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with no filler and no repetition of the title. Every clause (list, archived roots, owner-restorable, purge deadlines) carries distinct information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be described; with zero parameters and full annotation coverage the description only needs to convey scope and it does. Minor ambiguity remains around "roots" (whether descendants are excluded) and result ordering/pagination, which the description leaves unstated.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters and the schema coverage is 100%, so there is nothing for the description to disambiguate. Baseline 4 applies; no parameter detail is needed or missing.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Specific verb ("List") plus a precisely scoped resource: archived sheet AND folder roots, restricted to "owner-restorable" items, returning purge deadlines. An agent can distinguish this from siblings such as sheets_list, sheets_list_folder_page, and sheets_restore without opening any schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the qualifiers: you call this to discover archived items that are still restorable before a purge deadline. However, with ~60 siblings including sheets_restore and sheets_restore_folder, the description never states the follow-up or the when-not (e.g., use sheets_list for live sheets).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.