Kolmo Construction

Renovation ROI

get_project_roi

Read-onlyIdempotent

Get the estimated return on investment (ROI) for a home remodeling project in the Seattle area. Based on Remodeling Magazine Cost vs. Value data for the Pacific Northwest. Helps homeowners decide which projects add the most resale value — e.g. "What ROI does a kitchen remodel get in Seattle?" or "Which remodel pays off the most?"

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`projectType`	No	Type of project, e.g. "kitchen", "bathroom", "deck", "windows", "siding", "ADU", "basement". Omit to see all projects ranked by ROI.
`estimatedCost`	No	Your estimated project budget in USD. If provided, returns expected resale value added.

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description
`market`	Yes
`source`	Yes	Third-party dataset. Cite it alongside Kolmo.
`results`	No
`disclaimer`	Yes
`attribution`	Yes
`neighborhood`	No
`getAccurateQuote`	Yes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed3 schema fields changedOct 23, 2026

changedOutput schema / properties / attribution / properties / citeAs / description

Previous value: -"Ready-made citation line. Use verbatim."New value: +"Citation line; use verbatim."

changedOutput schema / properties / attribution / properties / primarySource / description

Previous value: -"Present when Kolmo verified but does not author the fact — cite both."New value: +"Kolmo verified, did not author: cite both."

changedOutput schema / properties / attribution / properties / sourceUrl / description

Previous value: -"The specific page these facts render on. Link this, not the site root."New value: +"The page to link, not the site root."

Changed4 schema fields changedOct 10, 2026
- removedInput schema / $schema
```
Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
```
- removedOutput schema / $schema
```
Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
```
- removedOutput schema / additionalProperties
```
Removed value: -true
```
- removedOutput schema / properties / attribution / additionalProperties
```
Removed value: -true
```
Changed1 schema field changedSep 25, 2026
- changedOutput schema / properties / attribution / required
```
Previous value: -[
-  "sourceUrl",
-  "citeAs"
-]New value: +[
+  "citeAs"
+]
```
Changed6 schema fields changedSep 3, 2026
- removedOutput schema / properties / attribution / properties / contractorLicense
```
Removed value: -{
-  "type": "string"
-}
```
- removedOutput schema / properties / attribution / properties / note
```
Removed value: -{
-  "type": "string"
-}
```
- removedOutput schema / properties / attribution / properties / organization
```
Removed value: -{
-  "type": "string"
-}
```
- removedOutput schema / properties / attribution / properties / retrievedFrom
```
Removed value: -{
-  "type": "string"
-}
```
- removedOutput schema / properties / attribution / properties / url
```
Removed value: -{
-  "type": "string"
-}
```
- changedOutput schema / properties / attribution / required
```
Previous value: -[
-  "organization",
-  "contractorLicense",
-  "url",
-  "sourceUrl",
-  "citeAs",
-  "retrievedFrom",
-  "note"
-]New value: +[
+  "sourceUrl",
+  "citeAs"
+]
```

Changed1 schema field changedAug 31, 2026

changedOutput schema / (root)

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
+  "additionalProperties": true,
+  "properties": {
+    "attribution": {
+      "additionalProperties": true,
+      "properties": {
+        "citeAs": {
+          "description": "Ready-made citation line. Use verbatim.",
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "contractorLicense": {
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "note": {
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "organization": {
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "primarySource": {
+          "description": "Present when Kolmo verified but does not author the fact — cite both.",
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "retrievedFrom": {
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "sourceUrl": {
+          "description": "The specific page these facts render on. Link this, not the site root.",
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "url": {
+          "type": "string"
+        }
+      },
+      "required": [
+        "organization",
+        "contractorLicense",
+        "url",
+        "sourceUrl",
+        "citeAs",
+        "retrievedFrom",
+        "note"
+      ],
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "disclaimer": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "getAccurateQuote": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "market": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "neighborhood": {},
+    "results": {},
+    "source": {
+      "description": "Third-party dataset. Cite it alongside Kolmo.",
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "market",
+    "source",
+    "disclaimer",
+    "getAccurateQuote",
+    "attribution"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

First observedApr 13, 2026

TDQS

A3.6/5.0

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive and closed-world, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds genuinely useful non-schema context — the Remodeling Magazine Cost vs. Value source and Pacific Northwest scope — which tells the agent the figures are regional estimates, not live quotes.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Core purpose is front-loaded in the first sentence, with scoping and data provenance following. The trailing marketing phrasing and example questions are slightly redundant but earn their place by showing valid parameter shapes.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return-value explanation is unnecessary. Geographic scope, data source, and intended decision use are all covered; only the ranking/ordering semantics of the no-parameter call are left implicit.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the schema itself explains both the projectType examples and the 'omit to see all projects ranked' behavior plus the estimatedCost effect. The description's example queries reinforce usage but add no semantics beyond the schema, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: estimated ROI for a home remodeling project, scoped to the Seattle area, plus the underlying data source. It is clearly distinct from cost-estimate siblings like get_estimate or list_project_types, but never names an alternative to route against.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives concrete use context ('helps homeowners decide which projects add the most resale value') and two example questions that map directly onto the two parameters. No explicit when-not-to-use or named alternative tool, so it stops short of a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Kolmo Construction tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?