Skip to main content
Glama

Kolmo Construction

Kolmo work in a neighborhood

get_neighborhood_project_activity
Read-onlyIdempotent

See what remodeling projects Kolmo Construction has completed in a specific Seattle neighborhood or city. Returns project counts by category, example projects, and typical project descriptions. Great for hyperlocal social proof — e.g. "Has Kolmo worked in Ballard?" or "What has Kolmo done in Capitol Hill?"

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
neighborhoodYesSeattle neighborhood or city, e.g. "Ballard", "Capitol Hill", "Bellevue", "Queen Anne"

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
messageYes
byCategoryNo
contactUrlNo
attributionNo
neighborhoodNo
portfolioUrlNo
projectsFoundYes
recentExamplesNo
overallPortfolioNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / attribution / properties / citeAs / description
      Previous value: -"Ready-made citation line. Use verbatim."New value: +"Citation line; use verbatim."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / attribution / properties / primarySource / description
      Previous value: -"Present when Kolmo verified but does not author the fact — cite both."New value: +"Kolmo verified, did not author: cite both."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / attribution / properties / sourceUrl / description
      Previous value: -"The specific page these facts render on. Link this, not the site root."New value: +"The page to link, not the site root."
  2. Changed4 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
    • removedOutput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
    • removedOutput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -true
    • removedOutput schema / properties / attribution / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -true
  3. Changed6 schema fields changed
    • removedOutput schema / properties / attribution / properties / contractorLicense
      Removed value: -{
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / attribution / properties / note
      Removed value: -{
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / attribution / properties / organization
      Removed value: -{
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / attribution / properties / retrievedFrom
      Removed value: -{
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / attribution / properties / url
      Removed value: -{
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • changedOutput schema / properties / attribution / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "organization",
      -  "contractorLicense",
      -  "url",
      -  "sourceUrl",
      -  "citeAs",
      -  "retrievedFrom",
      -  "note"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "sourceUrl",
      +  "citeAs"
      +]
  4. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "attribution": {
      +      "additionalProperties": true,
      +      "properties": {
      +        "citeAs": {
      +          "description": "Ready-made citation line. Use verbatim.",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "contractorLicense": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "note": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "organization": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "primarySource": {
      +          "description": "Present when Kolmo verified but does not author the fact — cite both.",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "retrievedFrom": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "sourceUrl": {
      +          "description": "The specific page these facts render on. Link this, not the site root.",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "url": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "required": [
      +        "organization",
      +        "contractorLicense",
      +        "url",
      +        "sourceUrl",
      +        "citeAs",
      +        "retrievedFrom",
      +        "note"
      +      ],
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "byCategory": {},
      +    "contactUrl": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "message": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "neighborhood": {},
      +    "overallPortfolio": {},
      +    "portfolioUrl": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "projectsFound": {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    "recentExamples": {}
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "projectsFound",
      +    "message"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  5. First observed

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive, and closed-world, so safety is covered. The description adds useful behavioral context about output: project counts by category, example projects, and typical descriptions, which helps the agent know what it will get back. It does not mention pagination limits or handling of unknown neighborhoods.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, front-loaded with the core action and followed by return content and use cases. The 'Great for hyperlocal social proof' clause is mildly promotional but does convey intent efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-parameter read tool with full annotations and an output schema, the description covers purpose, scope, and output shape adequately. Minor gap: it does not clarify whether 'city' means non-Seattle cities (Bellevue is given as an example) or how unmatched neighborhoods are handled.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the single parameter already lists example values ('Ballard', 'Capitol Hill', 'Bellevue', 'Queen Anne'). The description restates the same framing ('a specific Seattle neighborhood or city') without adding format, casing, or fuzzy-match rules, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: 'See what remodeling projects Kolmo Construction has completed' scoped to a Seattle neighborhood or city. This is clearly distinct from siblings like list_projects (all projects) and get_neighbor_permit_activity (permit activity, not Kolmo's own work).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides concrete use-case framing with example questions ('Has Kolmo worked in Ballard?', 'What has Kolmo done in Capitol Hill?'), which tells the agent when this tool fits. It stops short of naming alternatives or exclusions — e.g. when to prefer list_projects or get_project for a specific project's details.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources