Skip to main content
Glama

Kolmo Construction

WA contractor license status

check_contractor_license_status
Read-onlyIdempotent

Look up any Washington State contractor's license, bond, and insurance status using public L&I data (updated daily). Works for Kolmo or any competitor. Great for verifying a contractor before hiring — checks if they are licensed, bonded, and insured in WA. Search by license number, business name, UBI, or phone number. Results are ranked closest match first; when identified is false, several businesses match and none should be reported as the contractor.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
queryYesContractor license number (e.g. "KOLMOL*753JS"), business name (e.g. "Kolmo LLC"), 9-digit UBI, or phone number

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nextNo
noteNo
foundYesfalse means L&I holds no matching record — a real answer, not a lookup failure.
queryYes
messageNo
resultsNo
verifyUrlNo
identifiedNotrue: the top results are one business. false: several businesses match, or only part of the name did — do not report any result as the contractor asked about.
searchedByNolicense-number, ubi, phone, trade-name or business-name
attributionNo
moreMatchesNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / attribution / properties / citeAs / description
      Previous value: -"Ready-made citation line. Use verbatim."New value: +"Citation line; use verbatim."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / attribution / properties / primarySource / description
      Previous value: -"Present when Kolmo verified but does not author the fact — cite both."New value: +"Kolmo verified, did not author: cite both."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / attribution / properties / sourceUrl / description
      Previous value: -"The specific page these facts render on. Link this, not the site root."New value: +"The page to link, not the site root."
  2. Changed4 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
    • removedOutput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
    • removedOutput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -true
    • removedOutput schema / properties / attribution / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -true
  3. Changed5 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / query / description
      Previous value: -"Contractor license number (e.g. \"KOLMOL*753JS\") or business name (e.g. \"Kolmo Construction\")"New value: +"Contractor license number (e.g. \"KOLMOL*753JS\"), business name (e.g. \"Kolmo LLC\"), 9-digit UBI, or phone number"
    • addedOutput schema / properties / identified
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "true: the top results are one business. false: several businesses match, or only part of the name did — do not report any result as the contractor asked about.",
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / moreMatches
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / note
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / searchedBy
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "license-number, ubi, phone, trade-name or business-name",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  4. Changed6 schema fields changed
    • removedOutput schema / properties / attribution / properties / contractorLicense
      Removed value: -{
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / attribution / properties / note
      Removed value: -{
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / attribution / properties / organization
      Removed value: -{
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / attribution / properties / retrievedFrom
      Removed value: -{
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / attribution / properties / url
      Removed value: -{
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • changedOutput schema / properties / attribution / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "organization",
      -  "contractorLicense",
      -  "url",
      -  "sourceUrl",
      -  "citeAs",
      -  "retrievedFrom",
      -  "note"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "sourceUrl",
      +  "citeAs"
      +]
  5. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "attribution": {
      +      "additionalProperties": true,
      +      "properties": {
      +        "citeAs": {
      +          "description": "Ready-made citation line. Use verbatim.",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "contractorLicense": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "note": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "organization": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "primarySource": {
      +          "description": "Present when Kolmo verified but does not author the fact — cite both.",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "retrievedFrom": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "sourceUrl": {
      +          "description": "The specific page these facts render on. Link this, not the site root.",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "url": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "required": [
      +        "organization",
      +        "contractorLicense",
      +        "url",
      +        "sourceUrl",
      +        "citeAs",
      +        "retrievedFrom",
      +        "note"
      +      ],
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "found": {
      +      "description": "false means L&I holds no matching record — a real answer, not a lookup failure.",
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "message": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "next": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "query": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "results": {},
      +    "verifyUrl": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "found",
      +    "query"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  6. First observed

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the annotations, the description adds important behavioral context: the data source is public L&I data updated daily, results are ranked closest match first, and an `identified` value of false means multiple businesses match and none should be reported as the contractor. These details materially affect how an agent should interpret and use the results.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the core action and scope, then moves through use case, search inputs, and result interpretation. The sentences are informative and appropriately sized, with no significant filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple one-parameter schema, rich annotations, and existing output schema, the description covers what an agent needs: data source and freshness, supported lookup keys, ranking behavior, and ambiguous-match handling. It does not need to explain return fields because the output schema already does that.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 100% description coverage for the single `query` parameter, including examples for license number, business name, UBI, and phone number. The description repeats those identifier types but does not add syntax or formatting details beyond what the schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: look up a Washington State contractor's license, bond, and insurance status using public L&I data. It clearly distinguishes this from sibling permit, business-info, and quote tools by focusing narrowly on contractor license verification.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives a clear use context — verifying a contractor before hiring — and lists the supported search identifiers. However, it does not explicitly contrast this tool with alternatives such as match_contractor_to_permit or get_business_info, nor does it state when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources