Import.io

Mouse Action

importio_action_mouse

Destructive

Send raw pointer events (move, down, up) for hover, drag, or canvas work where a selector click does not apply; fields carries the upstream MouseAction configuration. For standard activation of a button or link use importio_action_click, and for typing use importio_action_keyboard.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "fields": "<fields>"
    },
    "name": "importio_action_mouse"
  }
}

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description
`input`	No	Optional second playAction argument forwarded after the envelope; omit it unless the upstream action expects one.
`fields`	Yes	Action-specific configuration forwarded into the action envelope; each tool description states what it should contain where that contract is documented, otherwise it names the upstream configuration fields carries.
`optional`	No	Flag forwarded into the action envelope; omit it unless the upstream action documents it.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed3 schema fields changedNov 9, 2026

addedInput schema / properties / fields / description

Added value: +"Action-specific configuration forwarded into the action envelope; each tool description states what it should contain where that contract is documented, otherwise it names the upstream configuration fields carries."

addedInput schema / properties / input / description

Added value: +"Optional second playAction argument forwarded after the envelope; omit it unless the upstream action expects one."

addedInput schema / properties / optional / description

Added value: +"Flag forwarded into the action envelope; omit it unless the upstream action documents it."

First observedNov 9, 2026

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=true, openWorldHint=true, and idempotentHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds context about the raw pointer event types and what 'fields' carries, but it does not elaborate on failure modes or required permissions beyond what annotations provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The definition is two tight sentences with no wasted words. The primary use case is front-loaded, followed by the alternative routing guidance.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with three parameters, nested objects, and rich annotations, the description covers purpose, alternatives, and the role of 'fields.' The only minor gap is that it does not enumerate the expected contents of 'fields,' though that is delegated to upstream documentation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description notes that 'fields carries the upstream MouseAction configuration,' which names the upstream contract but does not detail its contents (e.g., coordinates, button, steps) beyond what the schema already says.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: 'Send raw pointer events (move, down, up)' and explicitly scopes it to hover, drag, or canvas work. It names the sibling alternatives importio_action_click and importio_action_keyboard, making it easy to distinguish from related tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives explicit when-to-use guidance ('where a selector click does not apply') and names the exact alternatives for standard activation and typing. No inference is needed to choose between this tool and its siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Import.io tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?