Skip to main content
Glama

Navigate Action

importio_action_goto

Navigate the browser to a URL as one step inside an importio_play_action pipeline; fields carries the EngineRequestOptions, typically url and wait. For standalone navigation use importio_goto, and confirm readiness with importio_action_wait_for_selector before reading content.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "fields": "<fields>"
    },
    "name": "importio_action_goto"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
inputNoOptional second playAction argument forwarded after the envelope; omit it unless the upstream action expects one.
fieldsYesAction-specific configuration forwarded into the action envelope; each tool description states what it should contain where that contract is documented, otherwise it names the upstream configuration fields carries.
optionalNoFlag forwarded into the action envelope; omit it unless the upstream action documents it.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / fields / description
      Added value: +"Action-specific configuration forwarded into the action envelope; each tool description states what it should contain where that contract is documented, otherwise it names the upstream configuration fields carries."
    • addedInput schema / properties / input / description
      Added value: +"Optional second playAction argument forwarded after the envelope; omit it unless the upstream action expects one."
    • addedInput schema / properties / optional / description
      Added value: +"Flag forwarded into the action envelope; omit it unless the upstream action documents it."
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false, openWorldHint=true, idempotentHint=false and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds pipeline-specific behavior: that this executes inside an action envelope and that readiness is not guaranteed on return, requiring a separate wait. It does not discuss failure modes or navigation timeouts, which keeps it below a 5.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single tight passage that front-loads the action and context, then packs the alternative and the follow-up step with no filler sentences.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers purpose, the essential contents of the required parameter, and the surrounding pipeline workflow, which is sufficient for a 3-parameter nested-schema tool with no output schema. The optional 'input' and 'optional' envelope params are left to their schema descriptions, a minor remaining gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the schema's 'fields' text is generic boilerplate and the description supplies concrete meaning: it carries EngineRequestOptions, typically url and wait. That is genuine added value over the schema wording.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Navigate the browser to a URL') plus a scoping qualifier ('as one step inside an importio_play_action pipeline') that separates it from the standalone importio_goto sibling. An agent can identify the tool's role without opening the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly routes to importio_goto for standalone navigation and recommends importio_action_wait_for_selector before reading content. Both the alternative and the sequencing condition are named rather than implied.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources