Skip to main content
Glama

ikhono_skill_search

Search iKhono for AI skills that match a query. Use this when the user asks you to do something that could benefit from specialized expertise. Returns a list of matching skills with their names, descriptions, ratings, usage counts, and pin counts.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
mineNoSet to true to show only your own skills (requires authentication)
limitNoMaximum number of results to return
queryNoSearch query to find relevant skills (e.g., "security review", "write tests", "api docs"). Leave empty when using mine or author filters to list all matching skills.
authorNoFilter by author username (e.g., "@alice" or "alice")
categoryNoFilter by category (e.g., "security", "testing", "documentation")

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It states the tool searches and returns specific fields, but omits authentication requirements (e.g., for 'mine' parameter) and does not discuss rate limits, pagination, or error conditions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences with no wasted words. First sentence states action and resource; second provides usage guidance and return value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description adequately lists return fields. It explains when to use but could be more explicit about filter behavior (e.g., query optional with mine/author). Overall complete for a search tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% (baseline 3). The description adds no parameter-specific detail beyond mentioning the query concept; it does not elaborate on filters or the 'mine' flag.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the tool's action ('Search') and resource ('iKhono for AI skills'), and distinguishes it from siblings like 'get' and 'list_pinned' by specifying it returns a list of matching skills with detailed fields.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides a clear use case ('when the user asks you to do something that could benefit from specialized expertise') but does not explicitly compare to alternative tools or state when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources