agenza_credit_score
Get an agent's credit score (0-850) computed from on-chain reputation data. Free tier is rate-limited to 100 queries/day.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| agentPrincipal | Yes | ICP principal of the agent |
Get an agent's credit score (0-850) computed from on-chain reputation data. Free tier is rate-limited to 100 queries/day.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| agentPrincipal | Yes | ICP principal of the agent |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Discloses rate limit and score range, adding context beyond the schema. However, without annotations, it does not state whether the tool is read-only or other behavioral traits.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences, zero wasted words, front-loaded with key information (purpose, range, rate limit).
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequately explains purpose and constraints but does not specify return format or whether the operation is read-only. Could be slightly more complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema covers 100% of parameter documentation. Description does not add additional meaning to the parameter beyond what the schema provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states verb 'Get' and resource 'agent's credit score', specifies range 0-850 and data source, distinguishing from sibling tools like agenza_info.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Mentions rate limit but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (agenza_info, agenza_register, agenza_verify).
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.