Skip to main content
Glama

Style a Page Region

helpcenter_update_template_region
DestructiveIdempotent

Style one region's wrapper on one page: its background, padding, bottom border and alignment.

It edits the help center's design DRAFT (its v2 template): the draft the dashboard's Template Editor opens, with a live preview. Nothing reaches visitors until helpcenter_publish_template — after editing, give the customer the Template Editor link from the result to review, and publish only when they ask. v2 help centers only (a classic one answers template_migration_required). Ids come from helpcenter_get_template.

config takes background (hex, or 'var(--hc-color-primary)' to follow the theme), padding (compact | standard | tall), borderBottom (boolean) and align (left | center); null resets one, and keys left out keep their value. Themes ship custom CSS that can paint a region itself (Compass paints the header and hero), and that CSS outranks this setting: when the outline marks the region "laid out by custom CSS", restyle it with helpcenter_add_template_css instead. This is the guide's update_region operation.

Args:

  • page, region: which region.

  • config (object): the styling keys to change.

  • etag (string, optional): from your last read or edit; refuses (stale_draft) if the draft changed since.

Returns: what each entry did (new ids), warnings worth relaying, and the draft status with its new etag.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "page": "<page>",
      "region": "<region>",
      "config": "<config>"
    },
    "name": "helpcenter_update_template_region"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
etagNoOptimistic lock: the draft etag from your last read, or the one your last edit returned. When given, the call is refused (stale_draft) if someone changed the draft since — so you never build on a state you have not seen. Omit to apply to the current draft.
pageYesPage kind: home, category, article, search, contact or notFound.
configYesRegion styling: background (hex or 'var(--hc-color-primary)'), padding (compact | standard | tall), borderBottom (boolean), align (left | center). null resets one.
regionYesRegion of the page: header, hero, sidebar, main, footer or utility.
site_idNoWhich help center to act on: an id from helpcenter_list_sites. Needed when this connection reaches more than one help center; omit it when it reaches one. Applies to this call only — pass it on every call of a task, and ask the user which help center they mean if their request does not say.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already flag this as a mutating, destructive, idempotent call, but the description adds substantial context: edits land in the v2 design DRAFT and never reach visitors until publish, the etag refuses with stale_draft on concurrent change, keys omitted keep their value while null resets, and theme CSS can outrank the setting. The only gap is that it doesn't explain the concrete effect of destructiveHint (e.g. what a null reset or overwrite loses).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The purpose is front-loaded and the paragraphing separates draft/publish workflow, config semantics, CSS precedence, and returns. It is dense and mostly earns its length, though the config key list is restated nearly verbatim from the schema and the 'guide's update_region operation' aside is marginal.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a nested-object mutation with no output schema, the description supplies the return shape (per-entry results with new ids, warnings, draft status and new etag), the workflow around publish, and the error conditions. An agent has everything needed to call it correctly and safely.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the description adds real meaning: config's merge semantics (omitted keys preserved, null resets), where ids come from (helpcenter_get_template), and how etag is sourced from the last read or edit. It does not cover site_id, but the schema documents that fully.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The first sentence names a specific verb, resource and scope: 'Style one region's wrapper on one page', with the exact properties touched. It also distinguishes itself from siblings by naming helpcenter_add_template_css and helpcenter_publish_template as the tools for adjacent jobs.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives explicit when/when-not guidance: use add_template_css instead when the outline marks the region as laid out by custom CSS, publish only when the customer asks, and note that classic (v1) help centers return template_migration_required. Alternatives and preconditions are both stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources