Skip to main content
Glama

YRUZ Promo Board: search listings (discovery)

promo_search_listings
Read-onlyIdempotent

Discovery: search the YRUZ Promo Board listings (live by default) with their 24 h campaign, countdown and top-link status. Same data as GET https://yruz.one/api/promo/listings

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "promo_search_listings"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
qNotext in title, description or host
pageNopage, 1-100
typeNoresource type
statusNoactive (default), expired or all
categoryNocategory id

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive and closed-world behavior, so the bar is low. The description still adds useful context: results are live by default and include campaign/countdown/top-link fields, which tells the agent what it will get back. Pagination behavior is not mentioned, but that is minor given the annotation coverage.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two efficient sentences with the purpose front-loaded. The trailing 'Same data as GET …' is mildly redundant but does help users cross-reference the underlying API.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a five-optional-parameter read-only search tool with no output schema, the definition supplies enough: what is searched, default liveness, and the notable returned fields. Missing only pagination/result-count behavior, which is a small gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and each parameter has its own description, so the schema carries the burden. The description adds only marginal semantics ('live by default' mirrors the status='active' default already in the schema) and no search-syntax details for q.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('search') and resource ('YRUZ Promo Board listings') plus the data returned (24 h campaign, countdown, top-link status). It is clear what the tool does, though it never names a sibling like promo_get_featured or promo_get_leaderboard to contrast with.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The 'Discovery:' prefix implies this is the broad search entry point, and 'live by default' hints at default scoping. However, there is no explicit when-to-use/when-not guidance and no mention of alternatives such as promo_get_listing for a single record.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.