Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In

GMPSignal Real-Time Intelligence MCP

by io.github.xpayrcom
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

global_trademark_brand_ip_monitor

Global Trademark & Brand IP Monitor: Monitors global trademark filings, brand infringements, and intellectual property registrations.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "global_trademark_brand_ip_monitor"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
maxResultsNoMaximum number of structured items to extract.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

C2.5/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden and does not meet it. It does not disclose data sources, geographic or jurisdictional coverage, update frequency/freshness, whether results are live or cached, or any auth requirements. 'Monitors' could imply a persistent subscription or a one-shot query, and the description never resolves that ambiguity.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is a single short sentence with no padding, which is structurally clean, but the leading repetition of the tool name consumes roughly half the content without adding information. Brevity here comes from under-specification rather than disciplined editing.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no annotations, no output schema, and no statement of what a returned item contains, the definition is too thin for an agent to invoke confidently. Because there is no output schema, the description should at minimum characterize the return shape and the meaning of 'monitor', and it does neither.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There is a single optional parameter (maxResults) with 100% schema description coverage, so the schema fully documents it. The description adds no meaning about what a 'structured item' is in this domain — a filing, an infringement notice, or a registration — which would have been genuinely useful context. Baseline 3 applies since the schema does the work.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a domain (trademark filings, brand infringements, IP registrations) but leans on the tool name repeated verbatim as its opening phrase. 'Monitors' is a vague verb that leaves unclear what the tool actually returns or does on invocation — a query returning filings, a watchlist setup, or a scan report. It is marginally more specific than the name alone, but not decisively.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to call this tool, no stated preconditions, and no pointer to any alternative (for example the sibling patent/citation intelligence or IP-risk underwriting tools). The agent must infer applicability from the name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All GMPSignal Real-Time Intelligence MCP toolsInspect
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources