Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In

GMPSignal Real-Time Intelligence MCP

by io.github.xpayrcom
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

b2b_cyber_insurance_ip_risk_underwriting_scanner

Cyber Insurance IP Vulnerability & CPE Risk Enricher: Real-time structured data extraction feed for Cyber Insurance IP Vulnerability & CPE Risk Enricher.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "b2b_cyber_insurance_ip_risk_underwriting_scanner"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
maxResultsNoMaximum number of structured items to extract.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

C2/5.0
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are supplied, so the description carries the full behavioral burden, and it discloses nothing: no indication of what target (IP, CPE, organization) is evaluated, whether it is a read-only lookup, what credentials or rate limits apply, or what the 'structured data extraction feed' returns. 'Real-time' is the only behavioral hint and it is unverifiable boilerplate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is short, but the second clause merely echoes the first, producing a title and a subtitle that say the same thing. Brevity here comes from under-specification rather than from efficient information packing.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with no annotations, no output schema, and a schema that exposes no target parameter at all, the description should at minimum explain what data set is queried and what is returned. It leaves the agent unable to predict inputs or outputs, so it is not complete enough to call the tool with confidence.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There is a single optional parameter (maxResults) with 100% schema description coverage, so the schema already explains it fully. The description adds no meaning about what the results are or how maxResults affects the extraction, leaving this at the documented baseline for high-coverage schemas.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose2/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description restates the tool name almost verbatim ('Cyber Insurance IP Vulnerability & CPE Risk Enricher') and adds only the generic phrase 'Real-time structured data extraction feed'. It names a domain but no concrete verb+resource pair (scan what? enrich what?), and it does nothing to separate it from siblings such as cyber_cve_kev_epss_vulnerability_scanner or cloud_perimeter_ip_attack_surface_auditor.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use, when-not-to-use, or alternative-tool guidance at all, despite heavy sibling overlap in the vulnerability/risk-scanner space. An agent has no basis from the description for choosing this tool over the CVE or Shodan scanners.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All GMPSignal Real-Time Intelligence MCP toolsInspect
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources