Skip to main content
Glama

Get XDaLa session detail

get_xdala_session_detail
Read-onlyIdempotent

Use this when the user asks for details, timeline, steps, payloads, or evidence for a concrete XDaLa session with owner and sessionId.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
ownerYesEVM address of the XDaLa session owner or relevant account.
sessionIdYesXDaLa session identifier used to query runtime or explorer data.
limitStepsNoValue for the limit steps parameter.
includePayloadsNoValue for the include payloads parameter.
includeFinalPayloadNoValue for the include final payload parameter.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesStructured result data returned by the XGR MCP gateway.

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, openWorldHint, idempotentHint, and no destructiveness. The description adds no additional behavioral traits (e.g., pagination, caching, authentication) beyond what annotations provide. It does not contradict them.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that immediately conveys the use case. Every word is necessary and informative. No wasted text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a detailed query tool with 5 parameters, 100% schema coverage, and an output schema (not shown but present), the description sufficiently sets expectations. It explicitly lists what the tool returns, which is complete given the available metadata.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, with all 5 parameters described inline. The tool description does not add semantic meaning beyond the schema's descriptions (e.g., it does not explain how the parameters affect the results). Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb (get) and resource (XDaLa session detail) and lists specific data retrieved (details, timeline, steps, payloads, evidence). It distinguishes from numerous sibling tools like get_session_status_live or get_latest_session_payload by specifying the level of detail.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly gives the use case ('when the user asks for...'), which guides when to invoke. It does not explicitly mention alternatives, but the context of many sibling tools and the specificity of the description make the intended usage clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Disambiguation2/5

There are many overlapping session-listing tools (list_xdala_sessions, get_recent_xdala_sessions, find_latest_xdala_session, list_xdala_session_ids, get_latest_session_payload) and duplicate validation tools (validate_xdala_bundle is an alias for validate_xgr_multibundle). Descriptions help but boundaries are still unclear.

Naming Consistency4/5

The verb_noun snake_case pattern is consistent across nearly all tools (get_, list_, create_, cancel_, validate_). Minor inconsistencies include the alias validate_xdala_bundle and interchangeable verbs like get_ vs read_ vs resolve_ for similar read operations.

Tool Count1/5

With 95 tools, this is far beyond the 25+ threshold for 'too many'. While the domain is broad, the sheer number makes the tool surface unwieldy and difficult for an agent to navigate.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers a wide range of operations: handoffs, session queries, transaction exploration, contract reads, validation, gas requests, and purchases. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no direct workflow editing tools), but overall the surface is remarkably complete.