Skip to main content
Glama

Search Movies & TV

tmdb.movies.search
Read-onlyIdempotent

Search for movies, TV shows, and people by name across 1M+ titles in 39 languages (TMDB)

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNoPage number (1-500, default 1)
queryYesSearch query (movie, TV show, or person name)
languageNoISO 639-1 language code (e.g. "en-US", "de-DE", "ja-JP"). Default: en-US
include_adultNoInclude adult content in results (default false)

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
errorNoPresent only when the call failed. Includes error code, message, request_id, and any provider-specific extras.
resultNoTool response payload. Shape varies per tool — consult the tool description and inputSchema. May be an object, array, string, or number depending on the upstream provider response.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate read-only, idempotent, and non-destructive behavior. Description adds scope details (1M+ titles, 39 languages) but does not disclose additional behavioral traits beyond what annotations provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence is concise and front-loaded with action. Could be slightly more structured, but it's efficient and no filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Description covers the main search scope (movies, TV, people, languages) and an output schema exists for return values. Minor omission: does not clarify that multiple media types can be searched simultaneously.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has 100% coverage for all 4 parameters with detailed descriptions. The description adds only a high-level phrase 'by name' which is already implied by the required 'query' parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it searches movies, TV shows, and people by name across 1M+ titles in 39 languages. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like details, discover, or trending.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like tmdb.movies.discover or tmdb.movies.trending. The description does not provide context about when search is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.