Skip to main content
Glama

warp-agent-mcp

by io.github.warpfreight

Get Shipment Documents

get_documents
Read-only

List shipment documents (BOL, POD, customs forms, etc.). Returns download URLs. Auth required. To fetch the Bill of Lading, pass document_type='bol' — this is how EXTERNAL / brokered (market-carrier) BOLs are returned now, not just Warp-carrier ones.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
order_idYesOrder ID (typically the same as shipment_id)
document_typeNoFilter to one document type. Common: 'bol' (Bill of Lading — required for external/market carrier BOLs), 'pod' (proof of delivery). Omit to list all documents.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark readOnlyHint=true. Description adds that auth is required and returns download URLs, providing useful behavioral context beyond the annotation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three concise sentences: purpose, return/auth, and a specific usage note. No fluff, front-loaded, every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given simple tool with 2 params and no output schema, description covers purpose, return value, auth, and special case. Could mention pagination or empty results but not critical; fairly complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers both parameters fully. Description adds value by clarifying that document_type filters to one type and gives common values ('bol', 'pod'), and explains special behavior for 'bol' fetching external BOLs.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool lists shipment documents with examples (BOL, POD, customs forms) and mentions returning download URLs. Differentiates from sibling tools like get_invoice which deals with financial documents, no direct competitor.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides specific guidance on using document_type='bol' for external BOLs and notes auth required, but does not explicitly state when to avoid this tool or mention alternatives among siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All warp-agent-mcp toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose. Overlapping tools like batch_quote, compare_modes, and per-mode quote tools are clearly differentiated by their scope and use cases. Batch vs single booking are also distinct.

Naming Consistency4/5

Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., batch_quote, list_bookings). A few like 'analytics' and 'events' are noun-only but still clear. Overall consistent with minor deviations.

Tool Count4/5

26 tools cover a broad logistics domain including quoting, booking, tracking, documents, and account management. While slightly heavy, each tool serves a specific function and the count is reasonable for the scope.

Completeness5/5

The tool set appears complete for freight operations: all major modes quoted, single/batch/multi-stop booking, tracking, documents, invoices, history, and account management. No obvious missing CRUD operations.

Resources