Skip to main content
Glama

bulletin_by_id

🚨 PRIMARY TOOL FOR KNOWN IDs 🚨 Fetch a bulletin by CVE or Vulners ID. Returns a COMPACT triage-card summary by default -- id, title, CVSS3, EPSS, CVE list, and a compact exploitation/AI signal -- NOT the full record. Pass fields=[...] to widen (e.g. add 'description', 'cvss', 'cvss2', 'affectedSoftware') or references=True for the linked-bulletin graph; requesting everything can be very large. Supports single ID or list of IDs. When list is provided, references are automatically set to False. NEVER use search_lucene for known IDs.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesSingle CVE ID, Vulners ID, or bulletin ID to fetch, or a list of IDs. Supports CVE identifiers (CVE-2024-21762), vendor-specific IDs (RHSA-2024:1234), or Vulners internal IDs. When a list is provided, references are always False regardless of the `references` argument.
fieldsNoOverride the default COMPACT field projection to widen the response. Pass ['*'] to request every field Vulners has for the bulletin (can be very large for popular CVEs). Useful individual fields to add: 'description' (full prose description, dropped from the default), 'cvss'/'cvss2' (legacy score variants; the default already includes 'cvss3'), 'affectedSoftware'/'cnaAffected' (affected systems), 'enchantments' (the FULL AI/exploitation blob, including the large cross-reference and social-mention indexes the default omits). If omitted, the lean default is used: id, title, type, href, published, modified, bulletinFamily, cvss3, epss, cvelist, enchantments.exploitation, enchantments.score, enchantments.vulnersScore, enchantments.tags, enchantments.short_description.
referencesNoInclude the full reference graph (linked advisories, patches, related bulletins) for a SINGLE-ID lookup. Defaults to False: the compact default projection already covers the essentials (CVSS3, EPSS, exploitation signal, CVE list). Set True only when you need the reference graph and can accept a much larger response -- for heavily-referenced CVEs this can inflate the payload from a few KiB to 100+ MiB. Ignored (always False) when `id` is a list.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.8/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden and does so: it names exactly what the default compact response contains, warns that requesting everything 'can be very large', and quantifies the reference-graph risk (a few KiB to 100+ MiB). Silent-list-mode behavior changes are disclosed rather than left to discovery.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the primary-use case and the size warnings, and every sentence carries operational content. Slightly verbose in places where it restates schema field lists, and the emoji banner is noise, but there is no filler paragraph.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present the description needn't document return shapes, and it still covers the practical gaps: default vs widened projections, payload size ceilings, and the list-mode override. Nothing an agent needs to call this correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the description adds real meaning: it enumerates the default projected field set, names high-value fields to widen with, and explains that list inputs force references=False. Most of this also appears in the schema field text, so it complements rather than exceeds it.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (Fetch) plus resource (bulletin) and scopes it to 'known IDs' via CVE or Vulners ID. It explicitly distinguishes itself from the sibling search_lucene, so an agent can pick it without opening either schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives explicit when-to-use ('PRIMARY TOOL FOR KNOWN IDs'), when-not ('NEVER use search_lucene for known IDs'), and the alternative widened-response path (fields=[...] or references=True). It also states the list-mode override ('references are automatically set to False'), leaving no routing ambiguity.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.