Skip to main content
Glama

Release Resource

release_resource

Give a resource slot back; the next in the queue is offered it.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "lease_id": "<lease_id>"
    },
    "name": "release_resource"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
lease_idYes

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

B3.3/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare a non-read-only, non-destructive mutation. The description adds useful behavioral context beyond the annotations: releasing the slot offers it to the next in queue. It does not cover error behavior or auth requirements, but this is a meaningful addition.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single front-loaded sentence with no wasted words: it states the action and its immediate effect. It is appropriately sized for a simple release tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple and has an output schema, so return values need not be explained. However, the description fails to explain the required lease_id parameter or where it comes from, and it gives no indication of error conditions or permissions, making it incomplete for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% for the single parameter lease_id, and the description never mentions the parameter at all. It does not explain what lease_id represents, where to obtain it, or how it relates to the resource slot, leaving a critical gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Give...back') and resource ('resource slot'), and adds the queue effect. It is clear what the tool does, but it does not distinguish itself from the sibling tool release_lease or mention the opposite operation acquire_resource.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the action: use it when you hold a resource slot and want to return it. However, there is no explicit when-to-use guidance, no mention of alternatives like release_lease, and no prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.