Skip to main content
Glama

veya_paid_discover

Read-only. List the resources this VEYA policy allows, with their input fields, a live quote (nothing is sent), the provider quote and total charged to your task budget for each resource, the per-call cap, task budget maximum and default, and a policy preview. Cannot pay.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "veya_paid_discover"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
  2. Added

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the behavioral burden well: it declares read-only behavior, says quotes do not send anything, and states that payment is impossible. It does not mention authorization requirements, possible error conditions, or rate limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with 'Read-only' and then lists the important returned data and constraints without filler. It is dense but appropriately sized, though the long comma-separated list could be slightly easier to scan.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter discovery tool with no output schema, the description provides useful return-field context and safety constraints. It could do a bit more to explain policy/auth context or failure modes, but it is broadly complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so there is no parameter semantics to explain and the baseline is 4. The description correctly does not fabricate parameter guidance.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('List') and resource ('the resources this VEYA policy allows'), and it enumerates the returned quote/budget/policy information. It also distinguishes the tool from payment siblings by stating 'Cannot pay.'

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The read-only scope and 'nothing is sent' / 'Cannot pay' language make the intended discovery use clear, especially relative to veya_paid_call or veya_paid_run. However, it does not explicitly name those alternatives or state a precise when-to-use workflow.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.