Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3; the description earns an extra point by adding the semantic layer the schema lacks — that weights marks a HELD list versus a merely followed one, and that omitting weights on an edit preserves existing values. The omit-vs-null mechanics are largely duplicated from the schema, which caps it at 4.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.