Skip to main content
Glama

Valuein — SEC EDGAR Fundamentals & Smart-Money Data

Delete an Uploaded Document

delete_uploaded_document
DestructiveIdempotent

Delete an uploaded document before its 24h TTL. UNDOABLE: restore_deleted with kind 'uploaded_document' brings it back while it is still within its 24h TTL and its file exists. Deleting a missing/already-expired/foreign id returns deleted:false rather than an error.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
upload_idYesThe upload_id returned by POST /v1/uploads.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
_metaYesProvenance envelope — data lineage for every MCP response
deletedYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / _meta / properties / cost_usd / properties / basis / description
      Previous value: -"payg_charge = real charge (agent-pay or your balance). payg_rate_card = indicative price, not billed."New value: +"payg_charge = real pay-per-call charge (a card or MPP payment through agent-pay). payg_rate_card = indicative price, not billed."
  2. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / _meta / properties / cost_usd / properties / basis / description
      Previous value: -"payg_charge = real agent-pay charge. payg_rate_card = indicative price, not billed."New value: +"payg_charge = real charge (agent-pay or your balance). payg_rate_card = indicative price, not billed."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / _meta / properties / cost_usd / properties / billed / description
      Previous value: -"true = this amount was actually charged via PAYG for this call. false = indicative PAYG-equivalent value; your plan already covers this call for free."New value: +"true = this amount was actually charged via PAYG for this call. false = indicative PAYG-equivalent value only: no charge was made for this call (it was within your plan)."
  3. Added
  4. Removed
  5. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / _meta / properties / fundamentals_as_of / description
      Previous value: -"ISO timestamp when the FINANCIAL STATEMENTS were last rebuilt. Use THIS — not `last_updated` — when telling a user how current the fundamentals are. The snapshot is republished on every weekday price refresh while the statements are carried forward unchanged, so `last_updated` can be far more recent than the numbers it sits next to."New value: +"ISO timestamp when the FINANCIAL STATEMENTS were last rebuilt in bulk. Use THIS — not `last_updated` — when telling a user how current the cross-sectional fundamentals are. The snapshot is republished on every weekday price refresh while the statements are carried forward unchanged, so `last_updated` can be far more recent than the numbers it sits next to. It is a floor for a single filer, not a ceiling: a filer with a live partition receives its filing, facts and ratios intraday (minutes after EDGAR dissemination), so an entity-scoped read may carry a filing newer than this; cross-sectional ranks (factor scores, earnings signals) refresh with the weekly bulk export."
  6. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / _meta / properties / fundamentals_as_of
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "ISO timestamp when the FINANCIAL STATEMENTS were last rebuilt. Use THIS — not `last_updated` — when telling a user how current the fundamentals are. The snapshot is republished on every weekday price refresh while the statements are carried forward unchanged, so `last_updated` can be far more recent than the numbers it sits next to.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / _meta / properties / price_as_of
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "ISO timestamp when the price surfaces were last refreshed.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  7. Added

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Goes well beyond the annotations (destructive, idempotent, not read-only): it discloses the undo path (restore_deleted with kind 'uploaded_document'), the TTL window during which undo works, and that missing/expired/foreign ids return deleted:false instead of erroring. Those are exactly the mutation-side details an agent needs before calling a destructive tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences, front-loaded with the action, then the recovery path, then the failure semantics. Every sentence carries distinct information an agent needs; no filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Destructive verb plus annotations mean safety is covered, an output schema covers the return shape, and the description fills the remaining gaps: undo procedure, TTL windows, and non-error failure behavior. Nothing material is left for the agent to guess.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3; the description adds real semantics beyond the schema by noting that a foreign or expired upload_id yields deleted:false, which tells the agent how the identifier is validated. It does not add format detail, but the schema already handles that.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Delete an uploaded document') plus a scope constraint (24h TTL), which separates it from get_uploaded_document and list_uploaded_documents by intent. It does not explicitly name those siblings, but the verb+resource combination makes selection unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when this applies ('before its 24h TTL') and names the undo counterpart restore_deleted, but it never states when NOT to use it or contrasts it with the read-side siblings (get/list_uploaded_documents) or with other deletion tools. Usage is inferred rather than spelled out.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.