Skip to main content
Glama

Valuein — SEC EDGAR Fundamentals & Smart-Money Data

Delete (Soft) Research Report

delete_report
DestructiveIdempotent

Soft-delete a report owned by the caller: status flips to delisted, visibility to private — not a hard delete, the row and R2 artifact are preserved (90-day audit window). Idempotent (deleting an already-delisted report succeeds). Sample tier rejected.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
report_idYesId from `create_report` or `list_my_reports`.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
_metaYesProvenance envelope — data lineage for every MCP response
statusYes
report_idYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / _meta / properties / cost_usd / properties / basis / description
      Previous value: -"payg_charge = real charge (agent-pay or your balance). payg_rate_card = indicative price, not billed."New value: +"payg_charge = real pay-per-call charge (a card or MPP payment through agent-pay). payg_rate_card = indicative price, not billed."
  2. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / _meta / properties / cost_usd / properties / basis / description
      Previous value: -"payg_charge = real agent-pay charge. payg_rate_card = indicative price, not billed."New value: +"payg_charge = real charge (agent-pay or your balance). payg_rate_card = indicative price, not billed."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / _meta / properties / cost_usd / properties / billed / description
      Previous value: -"true = this amount was actually charged via PAYG for this call. false = indicative PAYG-equivalent value; your plan already covers this call for free."New value: +"true = this amount was actually charged via PAYG for this call. false = indicative PAYG-equivalent value only: no charge was made for this call (it was within your plan)."
  3. Added
  4. Removed
  5. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / _meta / properties / fundamentals_as_of / description
      Previous value: -"ISO timestamp when the FINANCIAL STATEMENTS were last rebuilt. Use THIS — not `last_updated` — when telling a user how current the fundamentals are. The snapshot is republished on every weekday price refresh while the statements are carried forward unchanged, so `last_updated` can be far more recent than the numbers it sits next to."New value: +"ISO timestamp when the FINANCIAL STATEMENTS were last rebuilt in bulk. Use THIS — not `last_updated` — when telling a user how current the cross-sectional fundamentals are. The snapshot is republished on every weekday price refresh while the statements are carried forward unchanged, so `last_updated` can be far more recent than the numbers it sits next to. It is a floor for a single filer, not a ceiling: a filer with a live partition receives its filing, facts and ratios intraday (minutes after EDGAR dissemination), so an entity-scoped read may carry a filing newer than this; cross-sectional ranks (factor scores, earnings signals) refresh with the weekly bulk export."
  6. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / _meta / properties / fundamentals_as_of
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "ISO timestamp when the FINANCIAL STATEMENTS were last rebuilt. Use THIS — not `last_updated` — when telling a user how current the fundamentals are. The snapshot is republished on every weekday price refresh while the statements are carried forward unchanged, so `last_updated` can be far more recent than the numbers it sits next to.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / _meta / properties / price_as_of
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "ISO timestamp when the price surfaces were last refreshed.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  7. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / _meta / properties / cost_usd
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "description": "Per-call cost transparency. Omitted for subscription-only tools that have no PAYG-equivalent price.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "amount_usd": {
      +      "minimum": 0,
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    "basis": {
      +      "description": "payg_charge = real agent-pay charge. payg_rate_card = indicative price, not billed.",
      +      "enum": [
      +        "payg_charge",
      +        "payg_rate_card"
      +      ],
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "billed": {
      +      "description": "true = this amount was actually charged via PAYG for this call. false = indicative PAYG-equivalent value; your plan already covers this call for free.",
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "amount_usd",
      +    "billed",
      +    "basis"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / _meta / properties / latency_ms
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Wall-clock milliseconds this tool call took, measured server-side around the handler.",
      +  "minimum": 0,
      +  "type": "integer"
      +}
  8. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / _meta / properties / pit_safe / description
      Added value: +"true iff a zero-look-ahead point-in-time cut was applied to every returned figure"
  9. Added

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already flag destructive and idempotent behavior, but the description adds concrete effects the agent cannot infer: status becomes `delisted`, visibility becomes `private`, the row and R2 artifact are preserved, and a 90-day audit window applies. It also confirms idempotency with a specific example. This is substantial behavioral context beyond structured fields.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single front-loaded sentence with zero filler: the soft-delete behavior, state changes, artifact retention, idempotency, and sample-tier rejection are all delivered compactly. Nothing is repeated unnecessarily.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that an output schema exists, the description covers the important behavioral and precondition details an agent needs: ownership, state transition, non-destructive retention, idempotency, and rejection of sample tier. No critical call-time context is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There is only one parameter, and schema coverage is 100%, with the schema documenting report_id as coming from create_report or list_my_reports. The description does not add format or syntax details beyond that, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource ('Soft-delete a report') and immediately distinguishes it from a hard delete. It also clarifies ownership scope, so an agent can tell it apart from sibling tools like unpublish_report or restore_deleted.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives clear preconditions: the report must be owned by the caller, and sample-tier reports are rejected. However, it doesn't explicitly name alternatives such as unpublish_report or spell out when to choose delisting versus unpublishing, so it stops short of a full usage guide.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.