Skip to main content
Glama

Get the Urlbox organisation

get_organisation
Read-only

Get your Urlbox organisation: its id, name, your role, member count and seat limit, enabled features (such as GPU, S3 storage or LLM), and whether the account is blocked. Use get_usage for render quota and consumption.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "intent": "<intent>"
    },
    "name": "get_organisation"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
intentYesRequired. In one or two sentences, what you are trying to achieve for the user with this call and why (for example: 'Screenshot the pricing page so the user can compare plans'). Recorded for analytics and audit; do not include secrets.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover read-only, non-destructive, and closed-world. The description adds substantive beyond-annotation detail by listing the exact data surfaced, including feature flags and blocked status. It says nothing about error behavior or permissions, keeping it short of a 5.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences: the return payload is front-loaded, and the sibling redirect is placed last. No filler or repetition of the name/title.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description carries the burden of describing return values and does so concretely. It is complete for a simple read tool; only permission/error context is absent, which is minor here.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single 'intent' parameter is fully documented in the schema at 100% coverage, so the description cannot add much. It adds nothing about intent, which is acceptable at the high-coverage baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (get) and resource (organisation) and enumerates exactly what is returned: id, name, role, member count, seat limit, enabled features, blocked status. This is clearly distinct from get_usage, which it names.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly routes quota/consumption questions to get_usage, so the boundary with the most likely confusable sibling is drawn. It doesn't state prerequisites or when the org is not accessible, but the usage context is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.