Skip to main content
Glama

Delete a webhook

delete_webhook
DestructiveIdempotent

Permanently delete a project's webhook endpoint and its signing secrets, so Urlbox stops sending it render notifications. This cannot be undone. To pause deliveries in a way you can reverse, call update_webhook with enabled set to false instead.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "intent": "<intent>",
      "webhook": "<webhook>"
    },
    "name": "delete_webhook"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
intentYesRequired. In one or two sentences, what you are trying to achieve for the user with this call and why (for example: 'Screenshot the pricing page so the user can compare plans'). Recorded for analytics and audit; do not include secrets.
projectNoProject id (proj_…) or exact name. Defaults to your default project.
webhookYesThe webhook endpoint's id, from list_webhooks or create_webhook.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=true, so the safety class is known. The description adds context those annotations cannot: the signing secrets are destroyed too, deliveries stop, and the action is irreversible, which is exactly the operational detail needed before calling a destructive tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences ordered by importance: what is destroyed, that it is irreversible, and the reversible alternative. There is no filler or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive, fully schema-documented tool with no output schema, this covers everything an agent needs: scope of deletion, irreversibility, and the safer alternative. Nothing material is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all three parameters (intent, project, webhook) are already documented in the schema with id sources and defaults. The description adds no parameter-level meaning beyond that, which is the expected baseline when the schema carries the load.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: 'Permanently delete a project's webhook endpoint and its signing secrets'. It also names the downstream consequence (Urlbox stops sending render notifications), so an agent can distinguish it from update_webhook, create_webhook, and list_webhooks without opening a schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives an explicit when-not-to-use case and names the alternative: 'To pause deliveries in a way you can reverse, call update_webhook with enabled set to false instead.' That routes the agent away from an irreversible action when a reversible one exists.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.