Skip to main content
Glama

Get community about page

get_community_about
Read-onlyIdempotent

Get the About page of an X Community: description, rules, creation date, moderators and a preview of members. Returns raw JSON.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "communityId": "<communityId>"
    },
    "name": "get_community_about"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
max_charsNoMaximum characters of JSON to return (default 50000). Longer output is cut with a [TRUNCATED] marker. Lower it to save context, raise it if you need the full response.
communityIdYesNumeric community ID.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already establish that this is a safe read-only, idempotent, non-destructive operation. The description adds useful behavioral context by saying it returns raw JSON and by listing the returned sections, though it does not mention truncation behavior, which is left to the schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and front-loaded, naming the operation first and then listing the returned content. Every phrase contributes useful selection or return-value information, with no filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only getter with no output schema, the description gives enough return-value context by naming the About-page sections. It is not fully exhaustive about truncation or error behavior, but those details are either in the schema or not essential for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so communityId and max_chars are already documented in the input schema. The description adds no parameter-level meaning beyond that, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: get the About page of an X Community. It also enumerates the contents returned, which helps distinguish it from the basic get_community sibling, though it never explicitly names or contrasts that sibling.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the tool name and by the listed About-page contents, so an agent can infer it is for community metadata such as rules and moderators. However, there is no explicit guidance about when to choose this over get_community or search_communities.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.