Skip to main content
Glama

MaCalculatriceEnLigne

calculate_water_pressure_loss

Calculate water pressure loss in a pipe circuit including friction and elevation. Returns: {equiv_length_m}. See list_bundles for related 'plomberie' calculators.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
diameter_mmYesPipe internal diameter in millimeters
flow_rate_lpmYesFlow rate in liters per minute
pipe_length_mYesPipe length in meters
fittings_countNoNumber of fittings and elbows (each adds ~0.5m equivalent length)
elevation_change_mNoElevation change in meters (positive = uphill, negative = downhill)

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultNoComputed result. Object whose fields depend on the tool (e.g. {tax, marginal_rate, brackets} for tax tools, {volume_l, gallons} for volume tools).
sourceNoAuthoritative source for the rule or formula (e.g. "Article 197 CGI", "NF DTU 21").
formulaNoHuman-readable formula or method used (e.g. "I=P·r·t", "Magnus formula").
reference_urlNoLink to a calcul2 page documenting the calculation in detail.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and the description lacks behavioral details such as assumptions, formulas used, or any side effects. Only states the calculation and return key, which is insufficient for full transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no fluff. The first sentence states purpose and return, the second directs to related tools. Efficient and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the basic functionality but does not elaborate on how the parameters influence the calculation or the full output structure. Adequate given the presence of an output schema, but could be more thorough.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds no additional meaning to parameters beyond what the schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the tool calculates water pressure loss in a pipe circuit, specifying the factors (friction and elevation). Distinguishes from siblings by directing to list_bundles for related plumbing calculators.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides minimal guidance; mentions 'See list_bundles for related plomberie calculators' but does not explicitly specify when to use this tool versus alternatives or any exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.