MaCalculatriceEnLigne

calculate_property_tax_fr

Compute French taxe foncière (annual property tax). Use for owners of property in France. Inputs: cadastral rental value (valeur locative), commune rate %. Returns annual tax due. See list_bundles for related 'immobilier' calculators.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`cadastral_value`	Yes	Cadastral rental value (valeur locative cadastrale) in EUR
`commune_rate_pct`	No	Commune tax rate in % (default 25)

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`result`	No	Computed result. Object whose fields depend on the tool (e.g. {tax, marginal_rate, brackets} for tax tools, {volume_l, gallons} for volume tools).
`source`	No	Authoritative source for the rule or formula (e.g. "Article 197 CGI", "NF DTU 21").
`formula`	No	Human-readable formula or method used (e.g. "I=P·r·t", "Magnus formula").
`reference_url`	No	Link to a calcul2 page documenting the calculation in detail.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

First observedJul 13, 2026

TDQS

A4.3/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. Clearly indicates it returns annual tax due, implying read-only calculation. No side effects mentioned, which is appropriate for a calculator.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences covering purpose, usage, inputs, output, and cross-reference. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple calculator with output schema present, description adequately covers what the tool does, its inputs, and related tools. No gaps identified.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema provides full coverage with descriptions for both parameters. Description adds minimal value by restating inputs in context (cadastral value and commune rate), but baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses specific verb 'Compute', identifies the French tax name 'taxe foncière', and distinguishes from siblings by referencing 'list_bundles' for related calculators.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

States 'Use for owners of property in France' and points to related tools for broader context, but lacks explicit when-not-to-use or alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All MaCalculatriceEnLigne tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.