Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline of 3 applies. All three parameters (limit, cursor, status) are well-documented in the schema, including the opaque-cursor contract and the nuanced status enum semantics. The description itself adds nothing about parameters, but the schema fully compensates, so no deduction is warranted.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.