list_team_members
List team members for the current organization.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| page | No | ||
| limit | No |
List team members for the current organization.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| page | No | ||
| limit | No |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. Description implies read-only but does not disclose pagination behavior, data freshness, or response structure. Minimal disclosure.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no fluff, but under-specified. Acceptable length for a simple list tool, but lacks essential details.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has 2 parameters, no output schema, no annotations. Description fails to cover pagination, filters, or return format, leaving key usage details missing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 0% description coverage. Description does not explain the meaning of page and limit parameters, leaving their semantics unclear.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description states 'List team members for the current organization' – clear verb and resource, but does not distinguish from sibling tools like invite_team_member or remove_team_member.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like invite_team_member or update_team_member_role. Lacks context about pagination or filtering.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.