get_job_result
Fetch the completed result payload for an async simulation job by id.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| job_id | Yes | UUID of the async job |
Fetch the completed result payload for an async simulation job by id.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| job_id | Yes | UUID of the async job |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. Only states it fetches completed result payload, but no info on failure behavior, errors, or rate limits.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, 11 words, no redundancy. Front-loaded with verb and resource.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a simple fetch tool with one parameter. Missing details about return structure, but functional context is clear.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with job_id described as 'UUID of the async job'. Description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, baseline score applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Fetch' and the resource 'completed result payload for an async simulation job by id', distinguishing it from siblings like get_job_status and poll_job.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit instructions on when to use vs alternatives (e.g., get_job_status, cancel_job). Implies post-completion but lacks exclusions or prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.