Orivale Agent Intelligence

orivale_shopify_competitor

Read-onlyIdempotent

Analyze a Shopify or DTC e-commerce storefront domain's live SKU pricing distribution, markdown share, and 3 ad counter-angles.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "domain": "<domain>"
    },
    "name": "orivale_shopify_competitor"
  }
}

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`domain`	Yes	Storefront domain without scheme (e.g. allbirds.com)
`x402_payment`	No	Optional Base64 x402 PAYMENT-SIGNATURE (Base/Solana USDC) to unlock full payload.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed7 schema fields changedNov 13, 2026

changedInput schema / properties / domain / description

Previous value: -"Storefront domain (e.g. allbirds.com)"New value: +"Storefront domain without scheme (e.g. allbirds.com)"

addedInput schema / properties / domain / maxLength
```
Added value: +253
```
addedInput schema / properties / domain / minLength
```
Added value: +4
```

addedInput schema / properties / domain / pattern

Added value: +"^[a-zA-Z0-9](?:[a-zA-Z0-9-]{0,61}[a-zA-Z0-9])?(?:\\.[a-zA-Z]{2,})+$"

changedInput schema / properties / x402_payment / description

Previous value: -"Optional Base64 x402 PAYMENT-SIGNATURE"New value: +"Optional Base64 x402 PAYMENT-SIGNATURE (Base/Solana USDC) to unlock full payload."

addedInput schema / properties / x402_payment / maxLength
```
Added value: +8192
```
addedInput schema / properties / x402_payment / minLength
```
Added value: +16
```

First observedNov 13, 2026

TDQS

A3.6/5.0

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive, and open-world, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds 'live' data and lists what is returned, but says nothing about the x402 payment gating that the schema hints at ('unlock full payload'), meaning an agent could be surprised by a truncated result, nor about latency or failure modes when scraping a live storefront.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with the verb first and the deliverable list trailing. Every clause carries information; nothing is padded or redundant.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a two-parameter read-only analysis tool with no output schema, the description conveys the analysis scope and the three result components adequately. The main omission is the paid-unlock behavior implied by x402_payment, which affects what an agent should expect back.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with both 'domain' (format example, no scheme) and 'x402_payment' fully documented in the schema. The description adds no additional meaning about either parameter, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb ('Analyze') and resource ('Shopify or DTC e-commerce storefront domain') and enumerates the outputs: SKU pricing distribution, markdown share, and ad counter-angles. That is far more specific than its siblings, though it never explicitly distinguishes itself from domain-oriented siblings like orivale_tech_stack_signal or orivale_b2b_domain_enrich.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied: 'competitor' and 'counter-angles' signal a competitive-pricing research use case, but there is no explicit when-to-use, when-not-to-use, or named alternative. An agent working against the domain-input siblings has to infer the routing decision.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Orivale Agent Intelligence tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.