Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In

Orivale Agent Intelligence

by io.github.tapirro
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

orivale_bounties_radar

Read-onlyIdempotent

Scan live zero-KYC crypto, code & agent bounties with fake-escrow honeypot blocking and EV scoring. Free top-3 preview; pass x402_payment ($0.005 USDC) for full feed.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "orivale_bounties_radar"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
categoryNoVertical filter: all | content | agent | codeall
x402_paymentNoOptional Base64 x402 PAYMENT-SIGNATURE (Base/Solana USDC) to unlock full payload.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed6 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / category / default
      Added value: +"all"
    • changedInput schema / properties / category / description
      Previous value: -"Filter category: all | content | agent | code"New value: +"Vertical filter: all | content | agent | code"
    • addedInput schema / properties / category / enum
      Added value: +[
+  "all",
+  "content",
+  "agent",
+  "code"
+]
    • changedInput schema / properties / x402_payment / description
      Previous value: -"Optional Base64 x402 PAYMENT-SIGNATURE"New value: +"Optional Base64 x402 PAYMENT-SIGNATURE (Base/Solana USDC) to unlock full payload."
    • addedInput schema / properties / x402_payment / maxLength
      Added value: +8192
    • addedInput schema / properties / x402_payment / minLength
      Added value: +16
  2. First observed

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already cover the safety profile (readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive, openWorld), and the description usefully adds the paywall behavior, the price point, and that unpaid calls return a truncated premium-gated result. It says nothing about result volume, pagination, rate limits, or how the honeypot/EV filtering is reported, so it goes beyond the annotations but not far.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tight sentences with zero filler and the value proposition plus paywall mechanic front-loaded. Slight density cost from two undefined jargon terms in the first sentence.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a two-parameter read-only feed tool with no output schema, the description is largely sufficient: it states the data source, the safety screening, the preview/paywall mechanic, and the price. Greater completeness would require at least an indication of the return shape, such as what fields each bounty carries, since nothing else documents it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents both parameters including the enum values and the payment format, and the baseline is 3. The description does add value the schema lacks, namely the $0.005 USDC cost and the fact that omitting payment yields only three results; but it never clarifies the category semantics such as what "content" versus "agent" bounties mean.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Names a specific verb and resource: "Scan live zero-KYC crypto, code & agent bounties", plus two differentiators (fake-escrow honeypot blocking and EV scoring). The differentiation from siblings is self-evident since the sibling set is unrelated tooling, so the only deduction is that the jargon phrases ("EV scoring", "honeypot blocking") are left undefined.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives a concrete operating condition: you get a free top-3 preview, and you pass x402_payment when you want the full feed, with the price stated. It offers no exclusions or alternative tools, but there are no competing alternatives named in this catalog to disambiguate from.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Orivale Agent Intelligence toolsInspect
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources