agent-embassy

Trust Report

trust_report

Idempotent

Buy/don't-buy verdict on an x402 endpoint: probed unpaid, signed PROCEED, VERIFY_FIRST, or DO_NOT_PAY. Terms: trust_preflight. Action gate: trust_assurance. POST the tool inputs as JSON to paid_url with an x402 v2 PAYMENT-SIGNATURE header. See https://docs.cdp.coinbase.com/x402 Paid tool — $0.25, USDC on Base or Arbitrum One. Paid URL: https://aemb.pro/v1/trust/report.

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`url`	Yes	HTTPS URL of the candidate x402 endpoint to probe (max 2000 chars; no credentials in URL). Probed unpaid via GET, falling back to an empty-body POST when GET returns 404/405
`idempotency_key`	Yes	Idempotency key: UUID v4, client-generated, one per logical request. Replaying the same key on this tool returns the original receipt — the action is not re-run, and the first request's receipt wins even if you resend different inputs. Published example keys are rejected. Keys are scoped per tool and per payer account: a key never returns another wallet's receipt.

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description
`how`	Yes	How to pay: POST the tool inputs as JSON to paid_url with an x402 v2 PAYMENT-SIGNATURE header
`tool`	Yes	Tool name, e.g. check_url_custom
`asset`	Yes	Settlement asset
`price`	Yes	Exact price, e.g. "$0.25"
`networks`	Yes	EVM CAIP-2 network ids accepted
`paid_url`	Yes	x402-paid HTTPS URL to POST the tool inputs to
`facilitator`	Yes	x402 facilitator
`payment_required`	Yes	Always true: this MCP tool is a payment pointer; the tool itself is monetized via x402.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed1 schema field changedOct 23, 2026
- changedOutput schema / properties / price / description
```
Previous value: -"Exact price, e.g. \"$0.05\""New value: +"Exact price, e.g. \"$0.25\""
```
Changed1 schema field changedOct 17, 2026
- changedOutput schema / properties / tool / description
```
Previous value: -"Tool name, e.g. ping"New value: +"Tool name, e.g. check_url_custom"
```
Changed1 schema field changedOct 15, 2026
- changedOutput schema / properties / price / description
```
Previous value: -"Exact price, e.g. \"$0.15\""New value: +"Exact price, e.g. \"$0.05\""
```
Changed1 schema field changedOct 15, 2026
- changedOutput schema / properties / tool / description
```
Previous value: -"Tool name, e.g. verified_check"New value: +"Tool name, e.g. ping"
```

Changed2 schema fields changedSep 26, 2026

removedInput schema / properties / agent_wallet

Removed value: -{
-  "description": "Dev mode only: declares the account wallet (string, min 20 chars) when no x402 payment is present. Ignored in live mode — there the wallet is recovered from the verified payment authorization.",
-  "type": "string"
-}

changedInput schema / properties / idempotency_key / description

Previous value: -"Idempotency key: any non-empty string (a UUID is recommended; no format is enforced). Replaying the same key on this tool returns the original receipt — the action is not re-run, and the first request's receipt wins even if you resend different inputs. Keys are scoped per tool: the same key on another tool is unrelated."New value: +"Idempotency key: UUID v4, client-generated, one per logical request. Replaying the same key on this tool returns the original receipt — the action is not re-run, and the first request's receipt wins even if you resend different inputs. Published example keys are rejected. Keys are scoped per tool and per payer account: a key never returns another wallet's receipt."

Changed3 schema fields changedSep 24, 2026

changedInput schema / properties / agent_wallet / description

Previous value: -"dev mode only"New value: +"Dev mode only: declares the account wallet (string, min 20 chars) when no x402 payment is present. Ignored in live mode — there the wallet is recovered from the verified payment authorization."

addedInput schema / properties / idempotency_key / description

Added value: +"Idempotency key: any non-empty string (a UUID is recommended; no format is enforced). Replaying the same key on this tool returns the original receipt — the action is not re-run, and the first request's receipt wins even if you resend different inputs. Keys are scoped per tool: the same key on another tool is unrelated."

addedInput schema / properties / url / description

Added value: +"HTTPS URL of the candidate x402 endpoint to probe (max 2000 chars; no credentials in URL). Probed unpaid via GET, falling back to an empty-body POST when GET returns 404/405"

Changed3 schema fields changedSep 22, 2026

changedInput schema / properties / agent_wallet / description

Previous value: -"DEV MODE ONLY: wallet to attribute. In live mode the payer wallet from the verified x402 payment is used."New value: +"dev mode only"

removedInput schema / properties / idempotency_key / description

Removed value: -"Client-generated UUID; retries return the original receipt"

removedInput schema / properties / url / description

Removed value: -"HTTPS URL of the candidate x402 endpoint to probe (public hosts only; private IPs refused)"

AddedSep 22, 2026

TDQS

A4.2/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds important behavior beyond annotations: the endpoint is probed unpaid, results are signed verdicts, and the tool is paid via x402 with a specific price and networks. It also explains the required POST and PAYMENT-SIGNATURE header, though it does not cover every operational detail such as rate limits or payment failure behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The purpose and payment model are front-loaded, and most sentences carry useful information. The sibling mapping is terse to the point of being slightly cryptic, but the description avoids unnecessary length.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the 100% schema coverage, existing output schema, and annotations covering safety and idempotency, the description provides enough additional context about payment, invocation, and verdict type for an agent to call the tool correctly. No critical missing piece stands out.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so both parameters are already well documented. The description does not add meaningful semantics for url or idempotency_key beyond what the schema provides, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description gives a specific verb and resource: a buy/don't-buy verdict on an x402 endpoint, including the possible signed outcomes. It also distinguishes the tool from trust_preflight and trust_assurance by assigning those siblings to terms and action-gate roles.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It clearly frames the tool as the verdict step and names trust_preflight and trust_assurance as related tools, giving useful context for when to use it. However, it does not explicitly state exclusions or the precise conditions that should route an agent to a sibling instead.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All agent-embassy tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.