agent-embassy

Compute Alerts

compute_alerts

Idempotent

GPU price moves that matter: significant spot moves, in a signed receipt. limit defaults to 25. Live snapshot: compute_spot_prices. Past: compute_history. POST the tool inputs as JSON to paid_url with an x402 v2 PAYMENT-SIGNATURE header. See https://docs.cdp.coinbase.com/x402 Paid tool — $0.25, USDC on Base or Arbitrum One. Paid URL: https://aemb.pro/v1/markets/compute/alerts.

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description
`gpu`	No	Optional GPU filter, e.g. 'H100 SXM' (max 64 chars). Omit for all GPUs
`limit`	No	Max alerts to return; integer 1-50. Defaults to 25
`idempotency_key`	Yes	Idempotency key: UUID v4, client-generated, one per logical request. Replaying the same key on this tool returns the original receipt — the action is not re-run, and the first request's receipt wins even if you resend different inputs. Published example keys are rejected. Keys are scoped per tool and per payer account: a key never returns another wallet's receipt.

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description
`how`	Yes	How to pay: POST the tool inputs as JSON to paid_url with an x402 v2 PAYMENT-SIGNATURE header
`tool`	Yes	Tool name, e.g. check_url_custom
`asset`	Yes	Settlement asset
`price`	Yes	Exact price, e.g. "$0.25"
`networks`	Yes	EVM CAIP-2 network ids accepted
`paid_url`	Yes	x402-paid HTTPS URL to POST the tool inputs to
`facilitator`	Yes	x402 facilitator
`payment_required`	Yes	Always true: this MCP tool is a payment pointer; the tool itself is monetized via x402.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed1 schema field changedOct 23, 2026
- changedOutput schema / properties / price / description
```
Previous value: -"Exact price, e.g. \"$0.05\""New value: +"Exact price, e.g. \"$0.25\""
```
Changed1 schema field changedOct 17, 2026
- changedOutput schema / properties / tool / description
```
Previous value: -"Tool name, e.g. ping"New value: +"Tool name, e.g. check_url_custom"
```
Changed1 schema field changedOct 15, 2026
- changedOutput schema / properties / price / description
```
Previous value: -"Exact price, e.g. \"$0.15\""New value: +"Exact price, e.g. \"$0.05\""
```
Changed1 schema field changedOct 15, 2026
- changedOutput schema / properties / tool / description
```
Previous value: -"Tool name, e.g. verified_check"New value: +"Tool name, e.g. ping"
```

Changed2 schema fields changedSep 26, 2026

removedInput schema / properties / agent_wallet

Removed value: -{
-  "description": "Dev mode only: declares the account wallet (string, min 20 chars) when no x402 payment is present. Ignored in live mode — there the wallet is recovered from the verified payment authorization.",
-  "type": "string"
-}

changedInput schema / properties / idempotency_key / description

Previous value: -"Idempotency key: any non-empty string (a UUID is recommended; no format is enforced). Replaying the same key on this tool returns the original receipt — the action is not re-run, and the first request's receipt wins even if you resend different inputs. Keys are scoped per tool: the same key on another tool is unrelated."New value: +"Idempotency key: UUID v4, client-generated, one per logical request. Replaying the same key on this tool returns the original receipt — the action is not re-run, and the first request's receipt wins even if you resend different inputs. Published example keys are rejected. Keys are scoped per tool and per payer account: a key never returns another wallet's receipt."

Changed4 schema fields changedSep 24, 2026

changedInput schema / properties / agent_wallet / description

Previous value: -"dev mode only"New value: +"Dev mode only: declares the account wallet (string, min 20 chars) when no x402 payment is present. Ignored in live mode — there the wallet is recovered from the verified payment authorization."

addedInput schema / properties / gpu / description

Added value: +"Optional GPU filter, e.g. 'H100 SXM' (max 64 chars). Omit for all GPUs"

addedInput schema / properties / idempotency_key / description

Added value: +"Idempotency key: any non-empty string (a UUID is recommended; no format is enforced). Replaying the same key on this tool returns the original receipt — the action is not re-run, and the first request's receipt wins even if you resend different inputs. Keys are scoped per tool: the same key on another tool is unrelated."

addedInput schema / properties / limit / description

Added value: +"Max alerts to return; integer 1-50. Defaults to 25"

Changed4 schema fields changedSep 22, 2026

changedInput schema / properties / agent_wallet / description

Previous value: -"DEV MODE ONLY: wallet to attribute. In live mode the payer wallet from the verified x402 payment is used."New value: +"dev mode only"

removedInput schema / properties / gpu / description

Removed value: -"Class, e.g. 'H100 SXM'. Omit for all classes."

removedInput schema / properties / idempotency_key / description

Removed value: -"Client-generated UUID; retries return the original receipt"

removedInput schema / properties / limit / description

Removed value: -"Max alerts returned, 1-50 (default 25, most recent first)."

Changed1 schema field changedSep 21, 2026

changedInput schema / properties / gpu / description

Previous value: -"GPU class, e.g. 'H100 SXM'. Omit for all classes."New value: +"Class, e.g. 'H100 SXM'. Omit for all classes."

AddedSep 21, 2026

TDQS

A4.6/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the annotations, the description discloses critical invocation behavior: the tool is paid, costs $0.25 USDC on Base or Arbitrum One, requires POSTing inputs as JSON to the paid URL, and needs an x402 v2 PAYMENT-SIGNATURE header. It also mentions that results come in a signed receipt, which is important behavioral context not present in the annotations or schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The definition is compact and front-loads the core purpose before alternatives and payment instructions. The fragmented phrasing is dense but largely purposeful, though it could be slightly clearer in separating tool behavior from payment mechanics.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the output schema exists and the input schema is fully described, the description supplies the remaining essential context: payment model, authentication header, HTTP method, endpoint, cost, and sibling differentiation. An agent has enough information to invoke the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so parameters such as gpu and idempotency_key are already fully documented. The description only restates that limit defaults to 25, which is already in the schema, and adds no extra parameter semantics beyond that.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific resource and scope: significant GPU spot price moves returned as alerts in a signed receipt. It explicitly distinguishes itself from compute_spot_prices for live snapshots and compute_history for past data, so an agent can select it without opening sibling schemas.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It names the alternatives and the conditions that select them: compute_spot_prices for live snapshots and compute_history for past data. The opening phrase 'significant spot moves' also clarifies that this tool is for alerting on notable moves rather than raw current or historical prices.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All agent-embassy tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.