Skip to main content
Glama

Agent ID — Verify

agentid_verify
Idempotent

Agent ID state — valid, revoked, expired, or unknown — chain + envelope included. Unknown IDs: unknown, never error. Issue: agentid_issue; extend: agentid_renew. POST the tool inputs as JSON to paid_url with an x402 v2 PAYMENT-SIGNATURE header. See https://docs.cdp.coinbase.com/x402 Paid tool — $0.25, USDC on Base or Arbitrum One. Paid URL: https://aemb.pro/v1/agent-id/verify.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
agent_idYesThe Agent ID string returned at issuance (64 hex characters; case-insensitive). Rate-limited: 30 checks/min per client IP, 429 on exhaustion
idempotency_keyYesIdempotency key: UUID v4, client-generated, one per logical request. Replaying the same key on this tool returns the original receipt — the action is not re-run, and the first request's receipt wins even if you resend different inputs. Published example keys are rejected. Keys are scoped per tool and per payer account: a key never returns another wallet's receipt.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
howYesHow to pay: POST the tool inputs as JSON to paid_url with an x402 v2 PAYMENT-SIGNATURE header
toolYesTool name, e.g. check_url_custom
assetYesSettlement asset
priceYesExact price, e.g. "$0.25"
networksYesEVM CAIP-2 network ids accepted
paid_urlYesx402-paid HTTPS URL to POST the tool inputs to
facilitatorYesx402 facilitator
payment_requiredYesAlways true: this MCP tool is a payment pointer; the tool itself is monetized via x402.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / price / description
      Previous value: -"Exact price, e.g. \"$0.05\""New value: +"Exact price, e.g. \"$0.25\""
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / tool / description
      Previous value: -"Tool name, e.g. ping"New value: +"Tool name, e.g. check_url_custom"
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / price / description
      Previous value: -"Exact price, e.g. \"$0.15\""New value: +"Exact price, e.g. \"$0.05\""
  4. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / tool / description
      Previous value: -"Tool name, e.g. verified_check"New value: +"Tool name, e.g. ping"
  5. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / properties / agent_wallet
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "Dev mode only: declares the account wallet (string, min 20 chars) when no x402 payment is present. Ignored in live mode — there the wallet is recovered from the verified payment authorization.",
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • changedInput schema / properties / idempotency_key / description
      Previous value: -"Idempotency key: any non-empty string (a UUID is recommended; no format is enforced). Replaying the same key on this tool returns the original receipt — the action is not re-run, and the first request's receipt wins even if you resend different inputs. Keys are scoped per tool: the same key on another tool is unrelated."New value: +"Idempotency key: UUID v4, client-generated, one per logical request. Replaying the same key on this tool returns the original receipt — the action is not re-run, and the first request's receipt wins even if you resend different inputs. Published example keys are rejected. Keys are scoped per tool and per payer account: a key never returns another wallet's receipt."
  6. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / agent_id / description
      Added value: +"The Agent ID string returned at issuance (64 hex characters; case-insensitive). Rate-limited: 30 checks/min per client IP, 429 on exhaustion"
    • changedInput schema / properties / agent_wallet / description
      Previous value: -"dev mode only"New value: +"Dev mode only: declares the account wallet (string, min 20 chars) when no x402 payment is present. Ignored in live mode — there the wallet is recovered from the verified payment authorization."
    • addedInput schema / properties / idempotency_key / description
      Added value: +"Idempotency key: any non-empty string (a UUID is recommended; no format is enforced). Replaying the same key on this tool returns the original receipt — the action is not re-run, and the first request's receipt wins even if you resend different inputs. Keys are scoped per tool: the same key on another tool is unrelated."
  7. Added

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Goes well beyond the annotations: discloses that invocation is a POST of JSON with an x402 v2 PAYMENT-SIGNATURE header, the exact price ($0.25 USDC on Base or Arbitrum One), and the key behavioral guarantee that unknown IDs return 'unknown' and never error. This is consistent with readOnlyHint=false (paid write-style POST) and idempotentHint=true.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loads the outcome set and the never-error guarantee, then the sibling routing, then payment mechanics and endpoint. Dense but every element is functional; the price/docs/URL sentences are slightly crowded together but all earn their place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, return shape needn't be explained, and the description covers payment auth, cost, error semantics, and sibling routing. The only thing an agent might still want — rate-limit behavior — is left entirely to the schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so agent_id format and the idempotency-key contract (replay behavior, per-payer scoping, example-key rejection) are already fully documented in the schema. The description adds nothing about parameters, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States the resource (Agent ID state) and the exact outcomes it returns — valid, revoked, expired, unknown — plus that chain and envelope are included. It distinguishes itself from siblings by pointing to agentid_issue and agentid_renew for lifecycle operations. The verb 'verify' is only implied via the name rather than spelled out, which keeps it just short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly routes issuing to agentid_issue and extending to agentid_renew, giving the agent a clear sibling split. It also covers the payment mechanics needed to actually invoke it. It doesn't say when *not* to use it (e.g. what a revoke flow should call instead), so no exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.