Social Fetch

Search LinkedIn posts

linkedin_posts_search_list

Read-only

Search public LinkedIn posts site-wide by keyword (not scoped to one profile or company — use linkedin.profiles.posts.list or linkedin.company.posts.list for that). Returns a list (use cursor when paginated).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`q`	No	Alias for `query`. Prefer `query`.
`trim`	No	Ignored if this tool does not support it.
`limit`	No	Ignored if this tool does not support it.
`query`	No	Keyword or phrase to search for in public LinkedIn posts.
`cursor`	No	Opaque pagination cursor returned by a previous response.
`offset`	No	Ignored if this tool does not support it.
`context`	Yes	Describe the user's underlying goal in one sentence — not the tool you are calling.
`keywords`	No	Alias for `query`. Prefer `query`.
`pageSize`	No	Ignored if this tool does not support it.
`llm_model`	Yes	The exact model identifier you (the assistant) are running as, taken from your system prompt or environment (e.g. "claude-opus-4-8", "gpt-5.2"). Used for analytics only. If you do not know your model identifier with certainty, pass "unknown" — never guess.
`datePosted`	No	Optional filter for how recently matching posts were published.
`maxResults`	No	Ignored if this tool does not support it.
`max_results`	No	Ignored if this tool does not support it.
`conversation_id`	No	Echo the conversation_id from the server's previous response. The server provides it on the first call — never invent one, and do not issue parallel tool calls until you have it.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed9 schema fields changedSep 21, 2026

addedInput schema / properties / keywords

Added value: +{
+  "anyOf": [
+    {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "boolean"
+    }
+  ],
+  "description": "Alias for `query`. Prefer `query`."
+}

addedInput schema / properties / limit

Added value: +{
+  "anyOf": [
+    {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "boolean"
+    }
+  ],
+  "description": "Ignored if this tool does not support it."
+}

addedInput schema / properties / maxResults

Added value: +{
+  "anyOf": [
+    {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "boolean"
+    }
+  ],
+  "description": "Ignored if this tool does not support it."
+}

addedInput schema / properties / max_results

Added value: +{
+  "anyOf": [
+    {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "boolean"
+    }
+  ],
+  "description": "Ignored if this tool does not support it."
+}

addedInput schema / properties / offset

Added value: +{
+  "anyOf": [
+    {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "boolean"
+    }
+  ],
+  "description": "Ignored if this tool does not support it."
+}

addedInput schema / properties / pageSize

Added value: +{
+  "anyOf": [
+    {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "boolean"
+    }
+  ],
+  "description": "Ignored if this tool does not support it."
+}

addedInput schema / properties / q

Added value: +{
+  "anyOf": [
+    {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "boolean"
+    }
+  ],
+  "description": "Alias for `query`. Prefer `query`."
+}

addedInput schema / properties / trim

Added value: +{
+  "anyOf": [
+    {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "boolean"
+    }
+  ],
+  "description": "Ignored if this tool does not support it."
+}

changedInput schema / required

Previous value: -[
-  "query",
-  "context",
-  "llm_model"
-]New value: +[
+  "context",
+  "llm_model"
+]

Changed5 schema fields changedSep 5, 2026

removedInput schema / additionalProperties
```
Removed value: -false
```

addedInput schema / properties / context

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Describe the user's underlying goal in one sentence — not the tool you are calling.",
+  "type": "string"
+}

addedInput schema / properties / conversation_id

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Echo the conversation_id from the server's previous response. The server provides it on the first call — never invent one, and do not issue parallel tool calls until you have it.",
+  "type": "string"
+}

addedInput schema / properties / llm_model

Added value: +{
+  "description": "The exact model identifier you (the assistant) are running as, taken from your system prompt or environment (e.g. \"claude-opus-4-8\", \"gpt-5.2\"). Used for analytics only. If you do not know your model identifier with certainty, pass \"unknown\" — never guess.",
+  "type": "string"
+}

changedInput schema / required

Previous value: -[
-  "query"
-]New value: +[
+  "query",
+  "context",
+  "llm_model"
+]

Changed1 schema field changedAug 27, 2026

changedInput schema / $schema

Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"

Changed1 schema field changedJul 29, 2026
- addedInput schema / additionalProperties
```
Added value: +false
```
First observedJul 20, 2026

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations (readOnlyHint=true, openWorldHint=true) already cover the safety profile and result volatility; the description adds non-scoped site-wide behavior and cursor-based pagination without contradicting annotations. It could go further by disclosing rate limits or what fields each list item contains, but with annotations present this is solid.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tightly written sentences: the core behavior and scope appear first, the alternatives second, and the return/pagination note last. No filler or repetition of schema content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a search-list tool with 100% parameter schema coverage and no output schema, the description sufficiently conveys scope, return shape, and pagination. It does not describe the shape of list items, but 'Returns a list' plus cursor guidance is adequate for selecting and invoking the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents every parameter. The description adds only a generic 'keyword' and cursor/pagination hint, which maps to `query` and `cursor` but adds little new semantic information.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('Search'), resource ('public LinkedIn posts'), and scope ('site-wide by keyword'). Explicitly contrasts with profile/company-scoped search, so an agent can tell it apart from linkedin_company_posts_list and similar siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives explicit when-to-use (site-wide keyword search) and when-not-to (profile/company-scoped), naming two alternatives. Adds a pagination note ('use cursor when paginated') that tells the agent how to continue retrieving results. The alternative names use dot notation rather than the sibling naming convention, but the routing intent is unambiguous.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Social Fetch tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Search LinkedIn posts

Input Schema

Schema Changelog

TDQS

Glama MCP Gateway

Resources