Skip to main content
Glama

Social Fetch

by io.github.social-freak-ltd
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

List similar LinkedIn organizations

linkedin_live_organization_similar_v2
Read-only

List similar LinkedIn organizations. Accepts a organization id. Returns a list (use cursor when paginated).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
trimNoIgnored if this tool does not support it.
limitNoIgnored if this tool does not support it.
offsetNoIgnored if this tool does not support it.
contextYesDescribe the user's underlying goal in one sentence — not the tool you are calling.
pageSizeNoIgnored if this tool does not support it.
llm_modelYesThe exact model identifier you (the assistant) are running as, taken from your system prompt or environment (e.g. "claude-opus-4-8", "gpt-5.2"). Used for analytics only. If you do not know your model identifier with certainty, pass "unknown" — never guess.
maxResultsNoIgnored if this tool does not support it.
max_resultsNoIgnored if this tool does not support it.
organizationIdYesNumeric LinkedIn organization ID.
conversation_idNoEcho the conversation_id from the server's previous response. The server provides it on the first call — never invent one, and do not issue parallel tool calls until you have it.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed7 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / limit
      Added value: +{
+  "anyOf": [
+    {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "boolean"
+    }
+  ],
+  "description": "Ignored if this tool does not support it."
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / maxResults
      Added value: +{
+  "anyOf": [
+    {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "boolean"
+    }
+  ],
+  "description": "Ignored if this tool does not support it."
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / max_results
      Added value: +{
+  "anyOf": [
+    {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "boolean"
+    }
+  ],
+  "description": "Ignored if this tool does not support it."
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / offset
      Added value: +{
+  "anyOf": [
+    {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "boolean"
+    }
+  ],
+  "description": "Ignored if this tool does not support it."
+}
    • changedInput schema / properties / organizationId / description
      Previous value: -"LinkedIn organization ID."New value: +"Numeric LinkedIn organization ID."
    • addedInput schema / properties / pageSize
      Added value: +{
+  "anyOf": [
+    {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "boolean"
+    }
+  ],
+  "description": "Ignored if this tool does not support it."
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / trim
      Added value: +{
+  "anyOf": [
+    {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "boolean"
+    }
+  ],
+  "description": "Ignored if this tool does not support it."
+}
  2. Added

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds a useful pagination behavior note ('use cursor when paginated'), which is beyond the annotations. It does not disclose rate limits, response shape, or whether the result set is ordered, but the annotations lower the burden.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences and front-loads the core purpose before the pagination note. It is appropriately sized with no filler, though it could have used the space to clarify which pagination parameters are relevant.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only list tool with 100% schema coverage and no output schema, the description covers the essential input and pagination behavior. However, with 10 parameters and several generic 'Ignored if this tool does not support it' fields, an agent may not know which parameters actually apply, and the description does not clarify the return format or how cursor pagination is triggered.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all parameters. The description adds minimal parameter meaning beyond identifying organizationId as the key input and mentioning pagination. The many 'Ignored if this tool does not support it' parameters are generic and the description does not clarify which are actually supported, but the schema coverage baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('List') and resource ('similar LinkedIn organizations') and identifies the required input ('Accepts a organization id'). It is clear enough to distinguish from the many LinkedIn sibling tools, though it does not explicitly name a sibling alternative.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is for finding similar organizations given an organization ID, and the pagination note ('use cursor when paginated') gives some usage context. However, it does not explicitly state when to prefer this over siblings like linkedin_live_organization_affiliated_v2 or linkedin_live_organizations_search_v2, nor does it mention any exclusions or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Social Fetch toolsInspect
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources