Skip to main content
Glama

List LinkedIn activity reactions

linkedin_live_activity_reactions_v2
Read-only

List reactions on a LinkedIn activity. Accepts a activity id. Returns a list (use cursor when paginated).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
trimNoIgnored if this tool does not support it.
limitNoIgnored if this tool does not support it.
startNo
cursorNo
offsetNoIgnored if this tool does not support it.
contextYesDescribe the user's underlying goal in one sentence — not the tool you are calling.
pageSizeNoIgnored if this tool does not support it.
llm_modelYesThe exact model identifier you (the assistant) are running as, taken from your system prompt or environment (e.g. "claude-opus-4-8", "gpt-5.2"). Used for analytics only. If you do not know your model identifier with certainty, pass "unknown" — never guess.
activityIdYesLinkedIn activity ID.
maxResultsNoIgnored if this tool does not support it.
max_resultsNoIgnored if this tool does not support it.
conversation_idNoEcho the conversation_id from the server's previous response. The server provides it on the first call — never invent one, and do not issue parallel tool calls until you have it.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed6 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / limit
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "description": "Ignored if this tool does not support it."
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / maxResults
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "description": "Ignored if this tool does not support it."
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / max_results
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "description": "Ignored if this tool does not support it."
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / offset
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "description": "Ignored if this tool does not support it."
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / pageSize
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "description": "Ignored if this tool does not support it."
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / trim
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "description": "Ignored if this tool does not support it."
      +}
  2. Added

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Adds the fact that the tool returns a list and recommends using cursor for pagination, which goes beyond the readOnlyHint/openWorldHint annotations. Does not mention rate limits, auth, or error behavior, but annotations already cover the safety profile. Modest value beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences with no fluff, front-loading the action. The minor grammar error ('a activity id') is negligible and does not harm comprehension. Well-sized for the information it conveys.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequate for a simple read-only list tool, but lacks detail on return item shape and specific pagination mechanics. The generic 'Ignored if this tool does not support it' schema descriptions leave ambiguity around the many pagination/limit parameters. Sufficient for a basic invocation but not fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 83% schema description coverage, the baseline is 3. The description only reiterates 'activity id' already present in the schema. It does not clarify which of the many pagination parameters (cursor vs offset/start/limit) should actually be used, despite mentioning cursor.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific action and resource: 'List reactions on a LinkedIn activity.' It doesn't explicitly distinguish from sibling tools like linkedin_live_activity_comments_v2, but the resource term 'reactions' separates it from comments and get variants. Clear but lacking explicit sibling differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to choose this over alternatives such as linkedin_live_activity_comments_v2 or linkedin_live_activity_get_v2. Usage is implied by the resource name, but no when-to-use or exclusion conditions are provided. The agent must infer the correct context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.