Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In

AIYuCha Domain Intelligence

by io.github.sinianchu9
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

Analyze domain value

analyze_domain_value
Read-onlyIdempotent

Give a transparent, broad illustrative USD structural price reference based on name and suffix, plus a 0-100 structural score. Does not fetch comparable transactions or guarantee resale value.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "domain": "<domain>"
    },
    "name": "analyze_domain_value"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
domainYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare this a safe, idempotent, open-world read, and the description adds genuine behavioral context beyond them: the valuation is broad/illustrative, not grounded in comparable transactions, and carries no resale guarantee. This manages expectations about reliability, which is exactly what the annotations cannot convey.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tight sentences with no filler; the positive capability and the caveats are both front-loaded and immediately scannable. Every clause earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description carries the return-value burden and does describe both outputs (USD price reference, 0-100 score). It omits the currency/scale of the USD figure and any error or invalid-domain behavior, but for a single-parameter read tool it is largely complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the single 'domain' parameter is undocumented in the schema, so the description has to compensate. It only partially does, implying the input is parsed into a name and a suffix, but it never states the expected format (bare label vs. full URL vs. punycode) that an agent would need to call it correctly.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb (give/analyze) and resource (domain value) and states the two outputs: a USD structural price reference and a 0-100 structural score. It distinguishes itself somewhat by noting the analysis is derived from 'name and suffix', but it never explicitly contrasts with siblings like analyze_domain_features or check_domain_risk.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied: it tells you the result is 'illustrative' and 'structural', and the exclusion 'Does not fetch comparable transactions' hints at when a different tool would be needed. However, no sibling is named and no explicit condition for choosing this over compare_domains or analyze_domain_features is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All AIYuCha Domain Intelligence toolsInspect
Try in Browser
Claude Code, inside the Godot 4 editorFlockbay puts an AI agent in the real Godot 4 editor: it writes GDScript, runs your game and fixes what breaks. Free, or bring your own Claude Code or Codex.flockbay.comAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources