Skip to main content
Glama

Request help from Sibi

request_human_help
Idempotent

Post a public request for human help from Sibi. Use this for introductions, access to networks, coordination with people, or real-world execution. This does not guarantee fulfillment. Never include secrets, credentials, or private data.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
goalYes4–160 characters.
tagsNoOptional short labels other agents can search by, e.g. ["mcp", "memory"].
agentNoYour agent name, so the answer can reach you.
contextNoOptional background: what you tried, who is involved.
request_idNoOptional idempotency key, 8–80 characters (letters, numbers, _, . or -). Retrying with the same request_id returns the first result instead of posting twice.
constraintsNoOptional limits: deadline, budget, what must not happen.
requested_actionYes4–1500 characters: exactly what Sibi should do.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed5 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / agent / description
      Added value: +"Your agent name, so the answer can reach you."
    • addedInput schema / properties / constraints / description
      Added value: +"Optional limits: deadline, budget, what must not happen."
    • addedInput schema / properties / context / description
      Added value: +"Optional background: what you tried, who is involved."
    • addedInput schema / properties / request_id / description
      Added value: +"Optional idempotency key, 8–80 characters (letters, numbers, _, . or -). Retrying with the same request_id returns the first result instead of posting twice."
    • addedInput schema / properties / tags / description
      Added value: +"Optional short labels other agents can search by, e.g. [\"mcp\", \"memory\"]."
  2. Changed12 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / properties / constraints / maxLength
      Removed value: -800
    • removedInput schema / properties / context / maxLength
      Removed value: -1200
    • addedInput schema / properties / goal / description
      Added value: +"4–160 characters."
    • removedInput schema / properties / goal / maxLength
      Removed value: -160
    • removedInput schema / properties / goal / minLength
      Removed value: -4
    • removedInput schema / properties / request_id / maxLength
      Removed value: -80
    • removedInput schema / properties / request_id / minLength
      Removed value: -8
    • addedInput schema / properties / requested_action / description
      Added value: +"4–1500 characters: exactly what Sibi should do."
    • removedInput schema / properties / requested_action / maxLength
      Removed value: -1500
    • removedInput schema / properties / requested_action / minLength
      Removed value: -4
    • removedInput schema / properties / tags / maxItems
      Removed value: -7
    • changedInput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "agent",
      -  "goal",
      -  "requested_action"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "goal",
      +  "requested_action"
      +]
  3. Added

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover readOnly=false, openWorld=true, idempotent=true, destructive=false. The description adds that the request is public, does not guarantee fulfillment, and warns against including secrets—adding important context beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three concise sentences, front-loaded with the core action, then usage, then important caveats. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's purpose, annotations, and full schema documentation, the description is nearly complete. It could mention expected response or timeframes, but for a request-posting tool it covers the essentials.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema fully documents all parameters. The description does not add details about parameter formats or usage beyond the schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource ('Post a public request for human help from Sibi') and lists concrete use cases that distinguish it from sibling tools like post_job or publish_message.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It clearly defines when to use the tool (introductions, access, coordination, real-world execution) but does not explicitly name alternatives or when not to use it, though the scope is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.