Skip to main content
Glama

calls_meet_browser

Read-onlyIdempotent

Attach to a Google Meet bot's live browser to diagnose and recover a bot that isn't visibly joining. Pass the meet session's call_id; returns a page_id. Then drive the bot's Meet page with the generic browser tools (browser.snapshot / browser.click / browser.take_screenshot / browser.evaluate / browser.console_messages / browser.network_requests) using that page_id — read the snapshot to see whether the bot is in the lobby, blocked, or admitted, and click guest-side controls to recover a stalled join. Note: host admission ('Admit') happens in the host's own browser and is not present on the bot's page.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
call_idYesThe meet session's call_id (UUID), e.g. from calls.send_to_meet's session_id or calls.list_active.
in_workspaceNoRun this one call in this workspace id instead of the session's. Nothing is stored; other sessions are not affected.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / in_workspace
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Run this one call in this workspace id instead of the session's. Nothing is stored; other sessions are not affected.",
      +  "type": "integer"
      +}
  2. Added
  3. Removed
  4. Added

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly/idempotent/openWorld/non-destructive, so the bar is lower. The description still adds real context: it returns a page_id, interaction happens through generic browser tools rather than this call, and recovery means clicking guest-side controls. The caveat that host-side 'Admit' is not on the bot's page is a genuinely useful behavioral boundary.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Purpose is front-loaded and every sentence carries information — the return value, the driving tools, the recovery intent, and the host-admission caveat. It is dense and slightly long, but nothing is wasted or redundant.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description must cover returns and it does (page_id). It also explains the downstream workflow and the critical caveat about host admission, giving an agent everything needed to call and use the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so both parameters (call_id, in_workspace) are fully documented in the schema. The description reinforces the required call_id ('Pass the meet session's call_id') but adds no syntax or format detail beyond the schema, matching the baseline 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (Attach) and resource (a Google Meet bot's live browser) with an explicit goal (diagnose and recover a bot that isn't visibly joining). It is clearly distinguishable from generic browser tools because it targets a bot's Meet page and returns a page_id for follow-up. An agent can identify the tool's role without opening the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives a clear trigger ('a bot that isn't visibly joining') plus the follow-on workflow, naming the exact browser.* tools to drive the page. It lacks an explicit 'do not use when X' or a direct routing statement against the close sibling browser_attach_meet, so it stops just short of full when/when-not guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.