vibecart.get_integration_instructionsReturns concise Next.js App Router guidance for installing VibeCart with trusted catalog pricing, multi-item checkout, and the shared MCP endpoint.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| rules | Yes | ||
| success | Yes | ||
| component | Yes | ||
| framework | Yes | ||
| mcpEndpoint | Yes | ||
| checkoutRoute | Yes | ||
| machineReadableSpec | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false, aligning with a safe, data‑retrieval operation. The description adds concrete context about the content of the returned guidance (trusted catalog pricing, multi‑item checkout, shared MCP endpoint), which is behaviorally informative beyond annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, front‑loaded sentence (23 words) efficiently conveys the tool's purpose and key deliverables. Every word adds value; there is no filler or redundancy.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given zero parameters, a comprehensive set of annotations, and an output schema present, the description is nearly complete. It states the type of guidance and its scope (Next.js App Router, VibeCart installation). It could mention prerequisites or error conditions, but the combination of annotations and output schema mitigates this gap.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, and schema coverage is 100%. With no parameters to explain, baseline 4 is appropriate. The description does not need to add parameter semantics since none exist.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool returns 'concise Next.js App Router guidance for installing VibeCart' with specific features (trusted catalog pricing, multi-item checkout, shared MCP endpoint). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like create_checkout, get_product, and list_products, which handle commerce operations rather than integration setup.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage for obtaining installation guidance but provides no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use advice. No alternatives are mentioned, and the context (sibling tools) suggests differentiation exists but is not articulated in the description itself.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.