Skip to main content
Glama

RationalBloks

by io.github.rationalbloks

Get Template Schemas

get_template_schemas
Read-onlyIdempotent

Get pre-built template schemas for common use cases. ⭐ USE THIS FIRST when creating a new project! Templates show the CORRECT schema format with: proper FLAT structure (no 'fields' nesting), every field has a 'type' property, foreign key relationships configured correctly, best practices for field naming and types. Available templates: E-commerce (products, orders, customers), Team collaboration (projects, tasks, users), General purpose templates. You can use these templates directly with create_project or modify them for your needs. TIP: Study these templates to understand the correct schema format before creating custom schemas.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and idempotentHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds valuable context by explaining the template contents (FLAT structure, type properties, relationships) and best practices, going beyond the basic read-only nature without contradicting any annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is efficiently structured with a main sentence, bullet points, and a practical tip. Every element serves a purpose: stating the function, listing template categories, and emphasizing usage. It's informative without being verbose, and the front-loaded 'USE THIS FIRST' captures immediate attention.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no parameters, no output schema, and a simple read-only operation, the description provides all necessary context: what templates exist, what they contain, and how to apply them. It fully prepares an agent to use the tool correctly and interpret its results.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. The description doesn't need to explain any parameter details, and it doesn't. It focuses on what the tool returns, which is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves pre-built template schemas for common use cases, listing specific categories (E-commerce, Team collaboration, General purpose). This distinctively differentiates it from sibling tools like get_schema or get_graph_schema, and the 'USE THIS FIRST' note establishes its unique role.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit guidance is provided: 'USE THIS FIRST when creating a new project', and it suggests using templates directly with create_project or modifying them. It also recommends studying templates before creating custom schemas, offering clear when-to-use context without ambiguity.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All RationalBloks toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Most tools are clearly differentiated by domain (project vs graph_project) and action (create, get, list, delete). The main ambiguity is get_project vs get_project_info, which both claim to return detailed project information. Otherwise tool boundaries are clear.

Naming Consistency4/5

The server follows a strong verb_noun convention, with parallel naming for graph and non-graph tools (create_project/create_graph_project, deploy_staging/deploy_graph_staging). Minor deviations include bulk_create_graph_nodes and fulltext_search_graph, but patterns remain predictable.

Tool Count2/5

48 tools is a heavy surface, even when accounting for the two parallel product domains (relational and graph). Many tools are near-duplicates across domains, and the count exceeds the 25-tool threshold that feels manageable. It would benefit from consolidation or sub-servers.

Completeness4/5

Both project types have full life-cycle coverage: create, schema management, deployment, rollback, and deletion, plus graph data operations including bulk, search, and traversal. Minor gaps exist, such as no update_graph_relationship and the redundant get_project/get_project_info pair, but agents can accomplish core workflows.

Resources