Skip to main content
Glama

Synthetic Persona Get

synthetic_persona_get
Read-onlyIdempotent

Get one saved synthetic persona by id (from synthetic_persona_list) with its full personaDetails and, for a persona built from the team's data, its grounding quotes. Spends nothing.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "id": "<id>"
    },
    "name": "synthetic_persona_get"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesPersona ID from synthetic_persona_list

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare this as read-only, idempotent, non-destructive, and closed-world. The description adds useful behavioral context by saying it 'Spends nothing' and by noting that grounding quotes appear only for personas built from the team's data.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The definition is a single tight sentence with the main action and return shape front-loaded. The 'Spends nothing' clause is short and materially useful rather than filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-parameter read tool with full schema coverage, annotations, and an output schema, the description is complete enough. It covers the id source, the returned details, the conditional grounding quotes, and the no-cost behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the schema already documents the single id parameter as coming from synthetic_persona_list. The description reinforces that provenance but does not add new syntax or format guidance beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb and resource: get one saved synthetic persona by id. It also states the returned payload, full personaDetails and grounding quotes for team-data personas, and distinguishes this single-item retrieval from synthetic_persona_list.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'from synthetic_persona_list' tells the agent where the required id comes from and implies the list-then-get workflow. It does not explicitly state when not to use this tool, but the get-vs-list distinction is clear from the description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources