Skip to main content
Glama

Fetch

fetch
Read-onlyIdempotent

Read one QuestionPunk study by the id search returned: its title, status, description and every question with its answer type and options, as text. Responses are not included.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "id": "<id>"
    },
    "name": "fetch"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesA study id from search

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYes
urlYes
textYes
titleYes
metadataNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive and closed-world, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds value beyond them by disclosing the output modality ('as text') and an explicit scope boundary (responses excluded), which the annotations cannot convey. It says nothing about authorization or behavior when the id is unknown or belongs to another user.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One sentence, front-loaded with the action and resource, followed by the payload list and the exclusion clause. No filler or repeated information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter read with an output schema and full annotation coverage, the description supplies everything needed to call it and to know what it will and will not return. The remaining gap is disambiguation from survey_get and any error/missing-id behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the single 'id' parameter is already documented as a UUID from search, so the description only echoes that provenance. With no syntax or edge-case detail added, baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Read one QuestionPunk study') and enumerates what is returned (title, status, description, questions with answer type and options). The bare name 'fetch' does no work on its own, and it is not distinguished from the sibling 'survey_get', so the agent must rely entirely on this sentence for the study-vs-survey distinction.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

'by the id search returned' establishes the required workflow (search first, then fetch), and 'Responses are not included' steers the agent to the responses_* family when answers are needed. It stops short of naming any alternative tool explicitly, so a call to survey_get vs fetch is left to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources