Skip to main content
Glama

QRStuff MCP Server

Get account entitlements

get_account_entitlements
Read-onlyIdempotent

Use this when the answer depends on what the user's account includes, for example "can I add a password to this code?". Returns the account's features and limits. Read-only. Use it to explain why something isn't available, never to promote a plan.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "get_account_entitlements"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare read-only, idempotent, non-destructive, and closed-world behavior, so the description does not need to carry the full safety burden. It adds useful behavioral guidance by specifying the intended explanatory use ('explain why something isn't available') and a prohibition ('never to promote a plan'), though it does not discuss auth or rate-limit behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short, front-loaded with the usage condition, and avoids unnecessary detail. The standalone 'Read-only' sentence is mildly redundant with the annotations, but overall the structure is efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple, parameterless, read-only tool with an output schema and comprehensive annotations, the description provides enough context to select and invoke it correctly. Return values are covered by the output schema, so no additional return-format explanation is needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so there are no parameter semantics to explain. The baseline for a parameterless tool applies, and the description does not need to compensate for any schema gaps.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource ('Returns the account's features and limits') and anchors it with a concrete decision example ('can I add a password to this code?'). This makes its scope distinguishable from sibling account tools such as account overview, activity, and scans.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It clearly says when to use the tool ('when the answer depends on what the user's account includes') and includes a negative usage constraint ('never to promote a plan'). It does not explicitly name alternative sibling tools, which keeps it short of a full 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources